Comment on C. M. Clark, L. Lawlor-Savage, & v. M. Goghari
Saved in:
| Title: | Comment on C. M. Clark, L. Lawlor-Savage, & v. M. Goghari |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Hiscock, Merrill |
| Source: | Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives. 2016 14(2):64-66. |
| Availability: | Psychology Press. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 3 |
| Publication Date: | 2016 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Opinion Papers Reports - Evaluative |
| Descriptors: | Intelligence Quotient, Change, Generational Differences, Ability, Intelligence, Individual Development |
| DOI: | 10.1080/15366367.2016.1172909 |
| ISSN: | 1536-6367 |
| Abstract: | Merrill Hiscock presents two criticisms of Clark's analysis of the Flynn effect. The first is that the authors worry too much about general ability and pay too little attention to multifactorial concepts of intelligence. The second applies not only to the Clark et al. paper but to the Flynn effect literature in general--namely, neglect of the developmental dimension. |
| Abstractor: | ERIC |
| Number of References: | 13 |
| Entry Date: | 2016 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1100108 |
| Database: | ERIC |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Merrill Hiscock presents two criticisms of Clark's analysis of the Flynn effect. The first is that the authors worry too much about general ability and pay too little attention to multifactorial concepts of intelligence. The second applies not only to the Clark et al. paper but to the Flynn effect literature in general--namely, neglect of the developmental dimension. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1536-6367 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/15366367.2016.1172909 |
