Drawing Firmer Conclusions: Autistic Children Show No Evidence of a Local Processing Bias in a Controlled Copying Task

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Drawing Firmer Conclusions: Autistic Children Show No Evidence of a Local Processing Bias in a Controlled Copying Task
Language: English
Authors: Smith, Alastair D. (ORCID 0000-0002-7335-4083), Kenny, Lorcan, Rudnicka, Anna, Briscoe, Josie, Pellicano, Elizabeth
Source: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. Nov 2016 46(11):3481-3492.
Availability: Springer. 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-348-4505; e-mail: service-ny@springer.com; Web site: http://www.springerlink.com
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 12
Publication Date: 2016
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Bias, Children, Autism, Pervasive Developmental Disorders, Spatial Ability, Freehand Drawing, Foreign Countries, Clinical Diagnosis, Diagnostic Tests, Observation, Asperger Syndrome, Intelligence Tests, Stimuli, Statistical Analysis, Regression (Statistics), Cues, Adolescents
Geographic Terms: United Kingdom
Assessment and Survey Identifiers: Raven Progressive Matrices, Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Childrens Embedded Figures Test
DOI: 10.1007/s10803-016-2889-z
ISSN: 0162-3257
Abstract: Drawing tasks are frequently used to test competing theories of visuospatial skills in autism. Yet, methodological differences between studies have led to inconsistent findings. To distinguish between accounts based on local bias or global deficit, we present a simple task that has previously revealed dissociable local/global impairments in neuropsychological patients. Autistic and typical children copied corner elements, arranged in a square configuration. Grouping cues were manipulated to test whether global properties affected the accuracy of reproduction. All children were similarly affected by these manipulations. There was no group difference in the reproduction of local elements, although global accuracy was negatively related to better local processing for autistic children. These data speak against influential theories of visuospatial differences in autism.
Abstractor: As Provided
Number of References: 53
Entry Date: 2016
Accession Number: EJ1117514
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:Drawing tasks are frequently used to test competing theories of visuospatial skills in autism. Yet, methodological differences between studies have led to inconsistent findings. To distinguish between accounts based on local bias or global deficit, we present a simple task that has previously revealed dissociable local/global impairments in neuropsychological patients. Autistic and typical children copied corner elements, arranged in a square configuration. Grouping cues were manipulated to test whether global properties affected the accuracy of reproduction. All children were similarly affected by these manipulations. There was no group difference in the reproduction of local elements, although global accuracy was negatively related to better local processing for autistic children. These data speak against influential theories of visuospatial differences in autism.
ISSN:0162-3257
DOI:10.1007/s10803-016-2889-z