View in EDS PDF Full Text

An Item Analysis of the French Version of the Test for Reception of Grammar among Children and Adolescents with Down Syndrome or Intellectual Disability of Undifferentiated Etiology

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: An Item Analysis of the French Version of the Test for Reception of Grammar among Children and Adolescents with Down Syndrome or Intellectual Disability of Undifferentiated Etiology
Language: English
Authors: Facon, Bruno, Magis, David
Source: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. Oct 2016 59(5):1190-1197.
Availability: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 2200 Research Blvd #250, Rockville, MD 20850. Tel: 301-296-5700; Fax: 301-296-8580; e-mail: slhr@asha.org; Web site: http://jslhr.pubs.asha.org
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 8
Publication Date: 2016
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Item Analysis, Grammar, Children, Adolescents, Down Syndrome, Intellectual Disability, Etiology, Difficulty Level, Test Items, Comparative Analysis, Test Bias, Statistical Analysis, Developmental Disabilities
DOI: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0179
ISSN: 1092-4388
Abstract: Purpose: An item analysis of Bishop's (1983) Test for Reception of Grammar (TROG) in its French version (F-TROG; Lecocq, 1996) was conducted to determine whether the difficulty of items is similar for participants with or without intellectual disability (ID). Method: In Study 1, responses to the 92 F-TROG items by 55 participants with Down syndrome (DS), 55 with ID of undifferentiated etiology (UND), and 55 typical children (TYP) matched on their F-TROG total score were compared using the transformed item difficulties method, a statistical approach designed to detect differential item functioning (DIF) between groups. In Study 2, an additional comparison involving 526 TYP participants and 526 participants with UND was conducted to increase the statistical power of the analysis. Results: The difficulty of items was highly similar whatever the sample size or clinical status of participants. Fewer than 3.5% of the items were flagged as showing DIF. Conclusions: Tests such as the TROG can be used with confidence in clinical practice as well as in research studies comparing participants with or without ID. Methods designed for investigating potential internal test bias--such as done here--should be more regularly employed in the developmental disability field to affirm the absence of DIF.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2016
Accession Number: EJ1119016
Database: ERIC
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
    Url: https://content.ebscohost.com/cds/retrieve?content=AQICAHj0k_4E0hTGH8RJwT4gCJyBsGNe_WN95AvKlDbXJGqwxwFdNVMDKNc1V4zsL5znsmlMAAAA4jCB3wYJKoZIhvcNAQcGoIHRMIHOAgEAMIHIBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHgYJYIZIAWUDBAEuMBEEDHY3rrz7cJnTZCIC6QIBEICBml3cDHxrST_odJ1sBp445S8YXkjvRXgMSx2y8XqSxgdMKrQefRToekqaeV7EiGTLAIXBbcKM4xZhQyoCNwdUTjk7sON3y_ohGeeeEY7Thgx9_78weUjyq549KCALQBG47GDiBQpmoONjxdX1qDdg0hw3PaCzm0BUdQ72zNpqxCJOzdPHj80OvycBib2mtAgE5q86cZ4FVNCeqGc=
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1119016
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: An Item Analysis of the French Version of the Test for Reception of Grammar among Children and Adolescents with Down Syndrome or Intellectual Disability of Undifferentiated Etiology
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Facon%2C+Bruno%22">Facon, Bruno</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Magis%2C+David%22">Magis, David</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Speech%2C+Language%2C+and+Hearing+Research%22"><i>Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research</i></searchLink>. Oct 2016 59(5):1190-1197.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 2200 Research Blvd #250, Rockville, MD 20850. Tel: 301-296-5700; Fax: 301-296-8580; e-mail: slhr@asha.org; Web site: http://jslhr.pubs.asha.org
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 8
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2016
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Item+Analysis%22">Item Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grammar%22">Grammar</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Children%22">Children</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Adolescents%22">Adolescents</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Down+Syndrome%22">Down Syndrome</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Intellectual+Disability%22">Intellectual Disability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Etiology%22">Etiology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Difficulty+Level%22">Difficulty Level</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Items%22">Test Items</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Comparative+Analysis%22">Comparative Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Bias%22">Test Bias</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+Analysis%22">Statistical Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Developmental+Disabilities%22">Developmental Disabilities</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0179
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 1092-4388
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Purpose: An item analysis of Bishop's (1983) Test for Reception of Grammar (TROG) in its French version (F-TROG; Lecocq, 1996) was conducted to determine whether the difficulty of items is similar for participants with or without intellectual disability (ID). Method: In Study 1, responses to the 92 F-TROG items by 55 participants with Down syndrome (DS), 55 with ID of undifferentiated etiology (UND), and 55 typical children (TYP) matched on their F-TROG total score were compared using the transformed item difficulties method, a statistical approach designed to detect differential item functioning (DIF) between groups. In Study 2, an additional comparison involving 526 TYP participants and 526 participants with UND was conducted to increase the statistical power of the analysis. Results: The difficulty of items was highly similar whatever the sample size or clinical status of participants. Fewer than 3.5% of the items were flagged as showing DIF. Conclusions: Tests such as the TROG can be used with confidence in clinical practice as well as in research studies comparing participants with or without ID. Methods designed for investigating potential internal test bias--such as done here--should be more regularly employed in the developmental disability field to affirm the absence of DIF.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2016
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1119016
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1119016
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0179
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 8
        StartPage: 1190
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Item Analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Grammar
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Children
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Adolescents
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Down Syndrome
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Intellectual Disability
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Etiology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Difficulty Level
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Test Items
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Comparative Analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Test Bias
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Statistical Analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Developmental Disabilities
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: An Item Analysis of the French Version of the Test for Reception of Grammar among Children and Adolescents with Down Syndrome or Intellectual Disability of Undifferentiated Etiology
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Facon, Bruno
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Magis, David
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 10
              Type: published
              Y: 2016
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 1092-4388
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 59
            – Type: issue
              Value: 5
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
              Type: main
ResultId 1