A Comparison of Student Engaged Time in Agriculture Instruction

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: A Comparison of Student Engaged Time in Agriculture Instruction
Language: English
Authors: Witt, Phillip A., Ulmer, Jonathan D., Burris, Scott, Brashears, Todd, Burley, Hansel
Source: Journal of Agricultural Education. 2014 55(2):16-32.
Availability: American Association for Agricultural Education. P.O. Box 7607, Department of Agricultural and Extension Education, Raleigh, NC 27695. Web site: http://www.aaaeonline.org
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 17
Publication Date: 2014
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Secondary Education
Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Agricultural Education, Comparative Analysis, Learner Engagement, Time Factors (Learning), Active Learning, Inquiry, Secondary School Teachers, Quasiexperimental Design, Control Groups, Experimental Groups, Classroom Observation Techniques, Animal Husbandry, Video Technology, Hypothesis Testing, Student Behavior, Protocol Analysis, Intermode Differences, Secondary School Students
ISSN: 1042-0541
Abstract: Teacher and student behaviors in the classroom have been linked to student achievement. The hands-on, real world experiences which students are offered through career and technical education courses provide an opportunity for agricultural education to make contributions to student achievement. The purpose of this study was to compare engaged time during traditional instruction and during the instruction of an inquiry based curriculum (CASE [Curriculum for Agricultural Science Education]). The target population for this study consisted of students enrolled in animal science courses taught by secondary agriculture teachers. The study employed a quasi-experimental, static-group comparison design. Nine CASE certified teachers represented the treatment group, which were matched with nine traditional agriculture teachers on selected criteria. Student engagement was measured using the Behavioral Observation of Students in Schools. Matched pairs t-tests were used to compare the CASE group and the traditional group on student engagement. Students in the CASE group were found to spend significantly more time actively engaged than those in traditional agriculture courses. From the findings it was concluded that the CASE curriculum and professional development can impact the active engagement of students in the classroom and potentially affect student achievement.
Abstractor: As Provided
Number of References: 52
Entry Date: 2016
Accession Number: EJ1122289
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:Teacher and student behaviors in the classroom have been linked to student achievement. The hands-on, real world experiences which students are offered through career and technical education courses provide an opportunity for agricultural education to make contributions to student achievement. The purpose of this study was to compare engaged time during traditional instruction and during the instruction of an inquiry based curriculum (CASE [Curriculum for Agricultural Science Education]). The target population for this study consisted of students enrolled in animal science courses taught by secondary agriculture teachers. The study employed a quasi-experimental, static-group comparison design. Nine CASE certified teachers represented the treatment group, which were matched with nine traditional agriculture teachers on selected criteria. Student engagement was measured using the Behavioral Observation of Students in Schools. Matched pairs t-tests were used to compare the CASE group and the traditional group on student engagement. Students in the CASE group were found to spend significantly more time actively engaged than those in traditional agriculture courses. From the findings it was concluded that the CASE curriculum and professional development can impact the active engagement of students in the classroom and potentially affect student achievement.
ISSN:1042-0541