Language Development in Deaf or Hard-of-Hearing Children with Additional Disabilities: Type Matters!

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Language Development in Deaf or Hard-of-Hearing Children with Additional Disabilities: Type Matters!
Language: English
Authors: Cupples, L. (ORCID 0000-0003-3659-1642), Ching, T. Y. C., Leigh, G., Martin, L., Gunnourie, M., Button, L., Marnane, V., Hou, S., Zhang, V., Flynn, C., Van Buynder, P.
Source: Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. Jun 2018 62(6):532-543.
Availability: Wiley-Blackwell. 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148. Tel: 800-835-6770; Tel: 781-388-8598; Fax: 781-388-8232; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 12
Publication Date: 2018
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
Contract Number: R01DC008080
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Language Acquisition, Deafness, Hearing Impairments, Disabilities, Comorbidity, Cohort Analysis, Language Skills, Preschool Children, Intelligence Tests, Verbal Ability, Vocabulary, Scores, Comparative Analysis, Statistical Analysis, Autism, Cerebral Palsy, Developmental Delays, Receptive Language, Oral Language, Cognitive Ability
Assessment and Survey Identifiers: Preschool Language Scale, Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test
DOI: 10.1111/jir.12493
ISSN: 0964-2633
Abstract: Background: This study examined language development in young children with hearing loss and different types of additional disabilities (ADs). Method: A population-based cohort of 67 children who were enrolled in the Longitudinal Outcomes of Children with Hearing Impairment study took part. Language ability was directly assessed at 3 and 5 years of age using the Preschool Language Scale, Fourth Edition and the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, Fourth Edition. Standard scores were used to enable comparison with age-based expectations for typically developing children. Results: Analysis of variance showed that, across the total cohort, children's language scores remained stable over the 2-year period. However, this overall stability masked a significant difference between children with different types of ADs; in particular, children with autism, cerebral palsy and/or developmental delay showed a decline in standard scores, whereas children with other disabilities showed a relative improvement. In addition, larger improvements in receptive vocabulary were associated with use of oral communication only. Conclusions: The results suggest that type of AD can be used to gauge expected language development in the population of children with hearing loss and ADs when formal assessment of cognitive ability is not feasible.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2018
Accession Number: EJ1178125
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Background: This study examined language development in young children with hearing loss and different types of additional disabilities (ADs). Method: A population-based cohort of 67 children who were enrolled in the Longitudinal Outcomes of Children with Hearing Impairment study took part. Language ability was directly assessed at 3 and 5 years of age using the Preschool Language Scale, Fourth Edition and the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, Fourth Edition. Standard scores were used to enable comparison with age-based expectations for typically developing children. Results: Analysis of variance showed that, across the total cohort, children's language scores remained stable over the 2-year period. However, this overall stability masked a significant difference between children with different types of ADs; in particular, children with autism, cerebral palsy and/or developmental delay showed a decline in standard scores, whereas children with other disabilities showed a relative improvement. In addition, larger improvements in receptive vocabulary were associated with use of oral communication only. Conclusions: The results suggest that type of AD can be used to gauge expected language development in the population of children with hearing loss and ADs when formal assessment of cognitive ability is not feasible.
ISSN:0964-2633
DOI:10.1111/jir.12493