The Impact of National Standardized Literacy and Numeracy Testing on Children and Teaching Staff in Remote Australian Indigenous Communities
Saved in:
| Title: | The Impact of National Standardized Literacy and Numeracy Testing on Children and Teaching Staff in Remote Australian Indigenous Communities |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Macqueen, Susy (ORCID |
| Source: | Language Testing. Apr 2019 36(2):265-287. |
| Availability: | SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 23 |
| Publication Date: | 2019 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research Tests/Questionnaires |
| Descriptors: | Numeracy, Standardized Tests, National Curriculum, Testing Programs, Indigenous Populations, Principals, Accountability, Foreign Countries, Rural Areas, Testing Problems, Educational Change, Multilingualism, Second Language Learning, Academic Achievement, Nonstandard Dialects, Culture Fair Tests, English (Second Language), Language Proficiency, Validity, Attendance, Psychological Patterns, Teacher Student Relationship |
| Geographic Terms: | Australia |
| DOI: | 10.1177/0265532218775758 |
| ISSN: | 0265-5322 |
| Abstract: | All educational testing is intended to have consequences, which are assumed to be beneficial, but tests may also have unintended, negative consequences (Messick, 1989). The issue is particularly important in the case of large-scale standardized tests, such as Australia's "National Assessment Program--Literacy and Numeracy" (NAPLAN), the intended benefits of which are increased accountability and improved educational outcomes. The NAPLAN purpose is comparable to that of other state and national 'core skills' testing programs, which evaluate cross-sections of populations in order to compare results between population sub-groupings. Such comparisons underpin 'accountability' in the era of population-level testing. This study investigates the impact of NAPLAN testing on one population grouping that is prominent in the NAPLAN results' comparisons and public reporting: children in remote Indigenous communities. A series of interviews with principals and teachers documents informants' first-hand experiences of the use and effects of NAPLAN in schools. In the views of most participants, the language and content of the test instruments, the nature of the test engagement, and the test washback have negative impacts on students and staff, with little benefit in terms of the usefulness of the test data. The primary issue is the fact that meaningful participation in the tests depends critically on proficiency in Standard Australian English (SAE) as a first language. This study contributes to the broader discussion of how reform-targeted standardized testing for national populations affects sub-groups who are not treated equitably by the test instrument or reporting for accountability purposes. It highlights a conflict between consequential validity and the notion of accountability that drives reform-targeted testing. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2019 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1210634 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1210634 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: The Impact of National Standardized Literacy and Numeracy Testing on Children and Teaching Staff in Remote Australian Indigenous Communities – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Macqueen%2C+Susy%22">Macqueen, Susy</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5404-6475">0000-0001-5404-6475</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Knoch%2C+Ute%22">Knoch, Ute</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3306-337X">0000-0002-3306-337X</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wigglesworth%2C+Gillian%22">Wigglesworth, Gillian</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nordlinger%2C+Rachel%22">Nordlinger, Rachel</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Singer%2C+Ruth%22">Singer, Ruth</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22McNamara%2C+Tim%22">McNamara, Tim</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Brickle%2C+Rhianna%22">Brickle, Rhianna</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Language+Testing%22"><i>Language Testing</i></searchLink>. Apr 2019 36(2):265-287. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 23 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2019 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research<br />Tests/Questionnaires – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Numeracy%22">Numeracy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Standardized+Tests%22">Standardized Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22National+Curriculum%22">National Curriculum</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Testing+Programs%22">Testing Programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Indigenous+Populations%22">Indigenous Populations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Principals%22">Principals</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Accountability%22">Accountability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Rural+Areas%22">Rural Areas</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Testing+Problems%22">Testing Problems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Change%22">Educational Change</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Multilingualism%22">Multilingualism</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Second+Language+Learning%22">Second Language Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+Achievement%22">Academic Achievement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Nonstandard+Dialects%22">Nonstandard Dialects</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Culture+Fair+Tests%22">Culture Fair Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22English+%28Second+Language%29%22">English (Second Language)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Language+Proficiency%22">Language Proficiency</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Validity%22">Validity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Attendance%22">Attendance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychological+Patterns%22">Psychological Patterns</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Student+Relationship%22">Teacher Student Relationship</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Australia%22">Australia</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1177/0265532218775758 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0265-5322 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: All educational testing is intended to have consequences, which are assumed to be beneficial, but tests may also have unintended, negative consequences (Messick, 1989). The issue is particularly important in the case of large-scale standardized tests, such as Australia's "National Assessment Program--Literacy and Numeracy" (NAPLAN), the intended benefits of which are increased accountability and improved educational outcomes. The NAPLAN purpose is comparable to that of other state and national 'core skills' testing programs, which evaluate cross-sections of populations in order to compare results between population sub-groupings. Such comparisons underpin 'accountability' in the era of population-level testing. This study investigates the impact of NAPLAN testing on one population grouping that is prominent in the NAPLAN results' comparisons and public reporting: children in remote Indigenous communities. A series of interviews with principals and teachers documents informants' first-hand experiences of the use and effects of NAPLAN in schools. In the views of most participants, the language and content of the test instruments, the nature of the test engagement, and the test washback have negative impacts on students and staff, with little benefit in terms of the usefulness of the test data. The primary issue is the fact that meaningful participation in the tests depends critically on proficiency in Standard Australian English (SAE) as a first language. This study contributes to the broader discussion of how reform-targeted standardized testing for national populations affects sub-groups who are not treated equitably by the test instrument or reporting for accountability purposes. It highlights a conflict between consequential validity and the notion of accountability that drives reform-targeted testing. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2019 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1210634 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1210634 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1177/0265532218775758 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 23 StartPage: 265 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Numeracy Type: general – SubjectFull: Standardized Tests Type: general – SubjectFull: National Curriculum Type: general – SubjectFull: Testing Programs Type: general – SubjectFull: Indigenous Populations Type: general – SubjectFull: Principals Type: general – SubjectFull: Accountability Type: general – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Rural Areas Type: general – SubjectFull: Testing Problems Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Change Type: general – SubjectFull: Multilingualism Type: general – SubjectFull: Second Language Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Academic Achievement Type: general – SubjectFull: Nonstandard Dialects Type: general – SubjectFull: Culture Fair Tests Type: general – SubjectFull: English (Second Language) Type: general – SubjectFull: Language Proficiency Type: general – SubjectFull: Validity Type: general – SubjectFull: Attendance Type: general – SubjectFull: Psychological Patterns Type: general – SubjectFull: Teacher Student Relationship Type: general – SubjectFull: Australia Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: The Impact of National Standardized Literacy and Numeracy Testing on Children and Teaching Staff in Remote Australian Indigenous Communities Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Macqueen, Susy – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Knoch, Ute – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Wigglesworth, Gillian – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Nordlinger, Rachel – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Singer, Ruth – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: McNamara, Tim – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Brickle, Rhianna IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 04 Type: published Y: 2019 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0265-5322 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 36 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Language Testing Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |