Contract Cheating: A Survey of Australian University Students

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Contract Cheating: A Survey of Australian University Students
Language: English
Authors: Bretag, Tracey (ORCID 0000-0001-8433-2675), Harper, Rowena (ORCID 0000-0002-5330-525X), Burton, Michael (ORCID 0000-0003-4213-4093), Ellis, Cath (ORCID 0000-0003-1921-6226), Newton, Philip (ORCID 0000-0002-5272-7979), Rozenberg, Pearl (ORCID 0000-0003-2121-8044), Saddiqui, Sonia (ORCID 0000-0003-2248-5742), van Haeringen, Karen (ORCID 0000-0003-2045-8943)
Source: Studies in Higher Education. 2019 44(11):1837-1856.
Availability: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 20
Publication Date: 2019
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Cheating, College Students, Outsourcing, Universities, School Surveys, Student Attitudes, Context Effect, Correlation, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Teacher Student Relationship, College Faculty, Student Evaluation, Educational Needs, Contracts, Curriculum Design, Prevention, Student Behavior, Plagiarism, Integrity
Geographic Terms: Australia
DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2018.1462788
ISSN: 0307-5079
Abstract: Recent Australian media scandals suggest that university students are increasingly outsourcing their assessments to third parties -- a behaviour known as 'contract cheating'. This paper reports on findings from a large survey of students from eight Australian universities (n = 14,086) which sought to explore students' experiences with and attitudes towards contract cheating, and the contextual factors that may influence this behaviour. A spectrum of seven outsourcing behaviours were investigated, and three significant variables were found to be associated with contract cheating: dissatisfaction with the teaching and learning environment, a perception that there are 'lots of opportunities to cheat', and speaking a Language Other than English (LOTE) at home. To minimise contract cheating, our evidence suggests that universities need to support the development of teaching and learning environments which nurture strong student--teacher relationships, reduce opportunities to cheat through curriculum and assessment design, and address the well-recognised language and learning needs of LOTE students.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2019
Accession Number: EJ1233218
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Recent Australian media scandals suggest that university students are increasingly outsourcing their assessments to third parties -- a behaviour known as 'contract cheating'. This paper reports on findings from a large survey of students from eight Australian universities (n = 14,086) which sought to explore students' experiences with and attitudes towards contract cheating, and the contextual factors that may influence this behaviour. A spectrum of seven outsourcing behaviours were investigated, and three significant variables were found to be associated with contract cheating: dissatisfaction with the teaching and learning environment, a perception that there are 'lots of opportunities to cheat', and speaking a Language Other than English (LOTE) at home. To minimise contract cheating, our evidence suggests that universities need to support the development of teaching and learning environments which nurture strong student--teacher relationships, reduce opportunities to cheat through curriculum and assessment design, and address the well-recognised language and learning needs of LOTE students.
ISSN:0307-5079
DOI:10.1080/03075079.2018.1462788