The Effectiveness of Problem Based Learning and Aptitude Treatment Interaction in Improving Mathematical Creative Thinking Skills on Curriculum 2013
Saved in:
| Title: | The Effectiveness of Problem Based Learning and Aptitude Treatment Interaction in Improving Mathematical Creative Thinking Skills on Curriculum 2013 |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Maskur, Ruhban, Sumarno, Rahmawati, Yasinta, Pradana, Kenny, Syazali, Muhamad, Septian, Ari, Kinarya Palupi, Endah |
| Source: | European Journal of Educational Research. 2020 9(1):375-383. |
| Availability: | Eurasian Society of Educational Research Association. Ataturk District 70.Str. No:15 Gaziantep, Turkey 27260. Tel: +90-342-2116792; Fax: +90-342-2116677; e-mail: editor@eu-jer.com; Web site: http://www.eu-jer.com |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 9 |
| Publication Date: | 2020 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Instructional Effectiveness, Problem Based Learning, Aptitude Treatment Interaction, Mathematics Instruction, Mathematics Skills, Thinking Skills, Creative Thinking, Models, Teaching Methods, Experimental Groups, Control Groups, Foreign Countries, Cognitive Processes |
| Geographic Terms: | Indonesia |
| ISSN: | 2165-8714 |
| Abstract: | The development of the revolution era 4.0 which increasingly rapidly demands the wider community to have the ability to think creatively mathematically. One effort to improve the ability to think creatively is through quality education. Quality education can be improved through to train thinking using the right learning model. This study aims to see which results are more effective in improving students' thinking skills between the two learning models applied. The two models are Problem Based Learning (PBL) and Aptitude Treatment Interaction (ATI) models. This research method uses quasi experimental method with a posttest only control test design not control group. This study uses two group subjects with two experimental classes. The analysis of the data used the hypothesis testing of the non-correlated 2-sample t-test. Based on the research results obtained Aptitude Treatment Interaction (ATI) models have a better effect on students' creative thinking abilities compared to Problem Based Learning (PBL) models. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2020 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1241243 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| Abstract: | The development of the revolution era 4.0 which increasingly rapidly demands the wider community to have the ability to think creatively mathematically. One effort to improve the ability to think creatively is through quality education. Quality education can be improved through to train thinking using the right learning model. This study aims to see which results are more effective in improving students' thinking skills between the two learning models applied. The two models are Problem Based Learning (PBL) and Aptitude Treatment Interaction (ATI) models. This research method uses quasi experimental method with a posttest only control test design not control group. This study uses two group subjects with two experimental classes. The analysis of the data used the hypothesis testing of the non-correlated 2-sample t-test. Based on the research results obtained Aptitude Treatment Interaction (ATI) models have a better effect on students' creative thinking abilities compared to Problem Based Learning (PBL) models. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2165-8714 |
