The Effect of Symbolic Distancing on Delay Tolerance across the Preschool Period
Saved in:
| Title: | The Effect of Symbolic Distancing on Delay Tolerance across the Preschool Period |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Pecora, Giulia, Bellagamba, Francesca, Chiarotti, Flavia, Paoletti, Melania, Castano, Maria Letizia, Addessi, Elsa |
| Source: | Journal of Cognition and Development. 2020 21(1):92-103. |
| Availability: | Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 12 |
| Publication Date: | 2020 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Early Childhood Education Preschool Education |
| Descriptors: | Delay of Gratification, Rewards, Food, Stimuli, Young Children, Preschool Children, Age Differences, Foreign Countries, Visual Stimuli, Toys, Preschool Education, Symbolic Learning, Inhibition, Child Behavior |
| Geographic Terms: | Italy (Rome) |
| DOI: | 10.1080/15248372.2019.1693374 |
| ISSN: | 1524-8372 |
| Abstract: | We aimed to longitudinally examine how symbolic distancing affects preschool children's delay tolerance in a delay choice task. We presented children with choices between a smaller immediate reward and a larger delayed reward in conditions with either symbolic stimuli or edible rewards. Overall, symbolic distancing modulated children's delay tolerance. In particular, whereas in the first phase (T1: 3- and 4-year-olds) children presented with edible rewards chose the larger option more often than children presented with symbolic stimuli, in the second phase (T2: 5- and 6-year-olds), there was no significant difference between children presented with symbolic stimuli and those presented with edible rewards. These results are discussed by examining how children's delay tolerance changes during the development and comparing children to adult humans in a similar task. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2020 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1241297 |
| Database: | ERIC |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | We aimed to longitudinally examine how symbolic distancing affects preschool children's delay tolerance in a delay choice task. We presented children with choices between a smaller immediate reward and a larger delayed reward in conditions with either symbolic stimuli or edible rewards. Overall, symbolic distancing modulated children's delay tolerance. In particular, whereas in the first phase (T1: 3- and 4-year-olds) children presented with edible rewards chose the larger option more often than children presented with symbolic stimuli, in the second phase (T2: 5- and 6-year-olds), there was no significant difference between children presented with symbolic stimuli and those presented with edible rewards. These results are discussed by examining how children's delay tolerance changes during the development and comparing children to adult humans in a similar task. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1524-8372 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/15248372.2019.1693374 |