A Cross-Linguistic Analysis of Formulaic Language and Meta-Discourse in Linguistics Research Articles by Natives and Arabs: Modeling Saudis and Egyptians
Saved in:
| Title: | A Cross-Linguistic Analysis of Formulaic Language and Meta-Discourse in Linguistics Research Articles by Natives and Arabs: Modeling Saudis and Egyptians |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Abdulaal, Mohammad Awad Al-Dawoody (ORCID |
| Source: | Arab World English Journal. Sep 2020 11(3):193-211. |
| Availability: | Arab World English Journal. 10602 Davlee Lane, Richmond, Texas, 77407. e-mail: editor@awej.org; e-mail: info@ASELS.org; Web site: https://awej.org/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 19 |
| Publication Date: | 2020 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Contrastive Linguistics, Computational Linguistics, Benchmarking, Discourse Analysis, Researchers, Documentation, Research Reports, Linguistics, Native Language, Second Language Learning, English (Second Language), Classification, Writing (Composition), Language Usage, Language Variation, Authors, Foreign Countries, Phrase Structure |
| Geographic Terms: | Egypt, Saudi Arabia |
| ISSN: | 2229-9327 |
| Abstract: | This corpus-based study aims to identify the interactional and interactive metadiscourse markers in terms of frequency in the abstract and discussion sections of research articles on linguistics, written in English by native, Egyptian, and Saudi researchers. To attain this aim, 60 research articles have been randomly compiled and analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively via AntConc.3.2.4 depending on Hyland's (2005) classification of metadiscourse markers (MM). Taking the abstracts and discussions written by the natives as a benchmark, this study poses the following essential question: How close and far is the amount of the interactional and interactive resources in Egyptian and Saudi abstracts and discussions to and from the native level? The results showed that except for hedges, evidential markers, and endophorics, the usage of attitudes, code glosses, engagement markers, self-mentions and transitions in the E-abstracts (i.e. written by Egyptian researchers) was much far from the native level. But in S-abstracts (i.e. abstracts written by Saudi researchers), only two close points to the native level have been recorded: transitions and engagements. In the E-discussion sections, unlike code glosses and frame markers, attitudes, boosters, endophorics, hedges, and self-mentions were reported very close to the N-level. In the S-discussion sections, boosters, code glosses, emphatic, engagement, frame markers, and transitions have recorded far rates from the N-level; whereas only attitudes and hedges were much close to the native normal level. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2020 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1269274 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1269274 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1269274 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: A Cross-Linguistic Analysis of Formulaic Language and Meta-Discourse in Linguistics Research Articles by Natives and Arabs: Modeling Saudis and Egyptians – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Abdulaal%2C+Mohammad+Awad+Al-Dawoody%22">Abdulaal, Mohammad Awad Al-Dawoody</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5471-5149">0000-0001-5471-5149</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Arab+World+English+Journal%22"><i>Arab World English Journal</i></searchLink>. Sep 2020 11(3):193-211. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Arab World English Journal. 10602 Davlee Lane, Richmond, Texas, 77407. e-mail: editor@awej.org; e-mail: info@ASELS.org; Web site: https://awej.org/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 19 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2020 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Contrastive+Linguistics%22">Contrastive Linguistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computational+Linguistics%22">Computational Linguistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Benchmarking%22">Benchmarking</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Discourse+Analysis%22">Discourse Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Researchers%22">Researchers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Documentation%22">Documentation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+Reports%22">Research Reports</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Linguistics%22">Linguistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Native+Language%22">Native Language</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Second+Language+Learning%22">Second Language Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22English+%28Second+Language%29%22">English (Second Language)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Classification%22">Classification</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+%28Composition%29%22">Writing (Composition)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Language+Usage%22">Language Usage</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Language+Variation%22">Language Variation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Authors%22">Authors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Phrase+Structure%22">Phrase Structure</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Egypt%22">Egypt</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Saudi+Arabia%22">Saudi Arabia</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2229-9327 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This corpus-based study aims to identify the interactional and interactive metadiscourse markers in terms of frequency in the abstract and discussion sections of research articles on linguistics, written in English by native, Egyptian, and Saudi researchers. To attain this aim, 60 research articles have been randomly compiled and analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively via AntConc.3.2.4 depending on Hyland's (2005) classification of metadiscourse markers (MM). Taking the abstracts and discussions written by the natives as a benchmark, this study poses the following essential question: How close and far is the amount of the interactional and interactive resources in Egyptian and Saudi abstracts and discussions to and from the native level? The results showed that except for hedges, evidential markers, and endophorics, the usage of attitudes, code glosses, engagement markers, self-mentions and transitions in the E-abstracts (i.e. written by Egyptian researchers) was much far from the native level. But in S-abstracts (i.e. abstracts written by Saudi researchers), only two close points to the native level have been recorded: transitions and engagements. In the E-discussion sections, unlike code glosses and frame markers, attitudes, boosters, endophorics, hedges, and self-mentions were reported very close to the N-level. In the S-discussion sections, boosters, code glosses, emphatic, engagement, frame markers, and transitions have recorded far rates from the N-level; whereas only attitudes and hedges were much close to the native normal level. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2020 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1269274 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1269274 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 19 StartPage: 193 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Contrastive Linguistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Computational Linguistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Benchmarking Type: general – SubjectFull: Discourse Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Researchers Type: general – SubjectFull: Documentation Type: general – SubjectFull: Research Reports Type: general – SubjectFull: Linguistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Native Language Type: general – SubjectFull: Second Language Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: English (Second Language) Type: general – SubjectFull: Classification Type: general – SubjectFull: Writing (Composition) Type: general – SubjectFull: Language Usage Type: general – SubjectFull: Language Variation Type: general – SubjectFull: Authors Type: general – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Phrase Structure Type: general – SubjectFull: Egypt Type: general – SubjectFull: Saudi Arabia Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: A Cross-Linguistic Analysis of Formulaic Language and Meta-Discourse in Linguistics Research Articles by Natives and Arabs: Modeling Saudis and Egyptians Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Abdulaal, Mohammad Awad Al-Dawoody IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 09 Type: published Y: 2020 Identifiers: – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2229-9327 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 11 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: Arab World English Journal Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |