Comparison of Population-Representative and Volunteer Experiments: Lessons from the Social Security Administration's Benefit Offset National Demonstration (BOND)

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Comparison of Population-Representative and Volunteer Experiments: Lessons from the Social Security Administration's Benefit Offset National Demonstration (BOND)
Language: English
Authors: Stapleton, David C. (ORCID 0000-0001-9147-3046), Bell, Stephen H. (ORCID 0000-0002-2286-5887), Hoffman, Denise, Wood, Michelle
Source: American Journal of Evaluation. Dec 2020 41(4):547-563.
Availability: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 17
Publication Date: 2020
Sponsoring Agency: Social Security Administration
Contract Number: SS001060011
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Evaluative
Descriptors: Federal Programs, Public Policy, Experiments, Comparative Analysis, Volunteers, Research Problems, Ethics, Costs, Research Design, Validity, Communication (Thought Transfer)
Laws, Policies and Program Identifiers: Social Security
DOI: 10.1177/1098214020944236
ISSN: 1098-2140
Abstract: The Benefit Offset National Demonstration (BOND) tested a $1 reduction in benefits per $2 earnings increase above the level at which Social Security Disability Insurance benefits drop from full to zero under current law. BOND included a rare and large "population-representative" experiment: It applied the rule to a nationwide, random sample of beneficiaries. BOND also included a parallel "volunteer" experiment: The same offset rules applied to a nationwide random sample of volunteers. BOND's dual experiments offer a unique opportunity to consider the merits and limitations of these two types of experiments. The findings provide a way to illustrate the limitations of volunteer experiments relative to population experiments when, as in BOND, the goal is to produce impact estimates that are valid for the entire population, not just would be volunteers. We also highlight and compare ethical issues, outreach challenges, and cost considerations for the two types of designs.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2020
Accession Number: EJ1274854
Database: ERIC
Be the first to leave a comment!
You must be logged in first