Making Authentic: Exploring Boundary Objects and 'Bricolage' in Knowledge Mobilisation through National Health Service-University Partnerships
Saved in:
| Title: | Making Authentic: Exploring Boundary Objects and 'Bricolage' in Knowledge Mobilisation through National Health Service-University Partnerships |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Melville-Richards, Lucy, Rycroft-Malone, Joanne, Burton, Christopher, Wilkinson, Joyce |
| Source: | Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice. Nov 2020 16(4):517-539. |
| Availability: | Policy Press. University of Bristol, 1-9 Old Park Hill, Bristol BS2 8BB, UK. Tel: +44-117-954-5940; e-mail: pp-info@policypress.co.uk; Web site: https://policypress.co.uk/journals/evidence-and-policy |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 23 |
| Publication Date: | 2020 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | National Programs, Health Services, Universities, Institutional Cooperation, Theory Practice Relationship, Knowledge Management, Foreign Countries, Interdisciplinary Approach |
| Geographic Terms: | United Kingdom |
| DOI: | 10.1332/174426419X15623134271106 |
| ISSN: | 1744-2648 |
| Abstract: | Background: In healthcare, bridging the research-to-practice gap is a top priority. Knowledge mobilisation scholars suggest that this gap can be closed through collaboration between knowledge users and producers. The concept of boundary objects--shared things and ideas that enable communication--has gained popularity across various collaborative work practices, but their potential within knowledge mobilisation in health care is understudied. An ongoing challenge for designers of boundary objects is how to create objects that are valued and shared both in principle and in practice. Aims and objectives: This paper reports on a study of boundary objects used during knowledge mobilisation through NHS-university partnerships called Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRCs). The distinction is investigated between boundary objects-in-theory and boundary objects-in-use, considering whether the latter possess specific characteristics which make them more effective during knowledge mobilisation. Methods: A qualitative case study of three CLAHRCs was conducted. Twenty-one people employed as 'boundary spanners' were interviewed to explore whether boundary objects played a role in knowledge mobilisation. Findings: The most effective boundary objects-in-use were co-produced through a process of bricolage. These possessed high levels of meaningfulness and resonance, and reconciled multiple user perspectives. Together these properties contributed to the overall authenticity of boundary objects-in-use. Discussion and conclusion: This paper helps to explain why designated boundary objects frequently fail in practice, and why there is a need to focus on understanding boundary objects based on symbolic, rather than structural, dimensions. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2020 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1275774 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1275774 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Making Authentic: Exploring Boundary Objects and 'Bricolage' in Knowledge Mobilisation through National Health Service-University Partnerships – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Melville-Richards%2C+Lucy%22">Melville-Richards, Lucy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rycroft-Malone%2C+Joanne%22">Rycroft-Malone, Joanne</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Burton%2C+Christopher%22">Burton, Christopher</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wilkinson%2C+Joyce%22">Wilkinson, Joyce</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Evidence+%26+Policy%3A+A+Journal+of+Research%2C+Debate+and+Practice%22"><i>Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice</i></searchLink>. Nov 2020 16(4):517-539. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Policy Press. University of Bristol, 1-9 Old Park Hill, Bristol BS2 8BB, UK. Tel: +44-117-954-5940; e-mail: pp-info@policypress.co.uk; Web site: https://policypress.co.uk/journals/evidence-and-policy – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 23 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2020 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22National+Programs%22">National Programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Health+Services%22">Health Services</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Universities%22">Universities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Institutional+Cooperation%22">Institutional Cooperation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Theory+Practice+Relationship%22">Theory Practice Relationship</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Knowledge+Management%22">Knowledge Management</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interdisciplinary+Approach%22">Interdisciplinary Approach</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+Kingdom%22">United Kingdom</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1332/174426419X15623134271106 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1744-2648 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Background: In healthcare, bridging the research-to-practice gap is a top priority. Knowledge mobilisation scholars suggest that this gap can be closed through collaboration between knowledge users and producers. The concept of boundary objects--shared things and ideas that enable communication--has gained popularity across various collaborative work practices, but their potential within knowledge mobilisation in health care is understudied. An ongoing challenge for designers of boundary objects is how to create objects that are valued and shared both in principle and in practice. Aims and objectives: This paper reports on a study of boundary objects used during knowledge mobilisation through NHS-university partnerships called Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRCs). The distinction is investigated between boundary objects-in-theory and boundary objects-in-use, considering whether the latter possess specific characteristics which make them more effective during knowledge mobilisation. Methods: A qualitative case study of three CLAHRCs was conducted. Twenty-one people employed as 'boundary spanners' were interviewed to explore whether boundary objects played a role in knowledge mobilisation. Findings: The most effective boundary objects-in-use were co-produced through a process of bricolage. These possessed high levels of meaningfulness and resonance, and reconciled multiple user perspectives. Together these properties contributed to the overall authenticity of boundary objects-in-use. Discussion and conclusion: This paper helps to explain why designated boundary objects frequently fail in practice, and why there is a need to focus on understanding boundary objects based on symbolic, rather than structural, dimensions. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2020 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1275774 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1275774 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1332/174426419X15623134271106 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 23 StartPage: 517 Subjects: – SubjectFull: National Programs Type: general – SubjectFull: Health Services Type: general – SubjectFull: Universities Type: general – SubjectFull: Institutional Cooperation Type: general – SubjectFull: Theory Practice Relationship Type: general – SubjectFull: Knowledge Management Type: general – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Interdisciplinary Approach Type: general – SubjectFull: United Kingdom Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Making Authentic: Exploring Boundary Objects and 'Bricolage' in Knowledge Mobilisation through National Health Service-University Partnerships Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Melville-Richards, Lucy – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Rycroft-Malone, Joanne – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Burton, Christopher – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Wilkinson, Joyce IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 11 Type: published Y: 2020 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1744-2648 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 16 – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |