Data-Based Student Learning Objectives for Teacher Evaluation

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Data-Based Student Learning Objectives for Teacher Evaluation
Language: English
Authors: Lin, Shuqiong, Luo, Wen, Tong, Fuhui (ORCID 0000-0003-0555-892X), Irby, Beverly J., Alecio, Rafael Lara (ORCID 0000-0001-5007-3580), Rodriguez, Linda, Chapa, Selena
Source: Cogent Education. 2020 7(1).
Availability: Cogent OA. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 19
Publication Date: 2020
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Early Childhood Education
Preschool Education
Descriptors: Student Educational Objectives, Teacher Evaluation, Data Use, Academic Achievement, Growth Models, Predictive Validity, Reliability, Scores, Preschool Teachers, Grouping (Instructional Purposes), School Districts, School District Size, Urban Schools, Bilingual Education, English (Second Language), Hispanic American Students, Preschool Children
Geographic Terms: Texas
Assessment and Survey Identifiers: Bracken Basic Concept Scale
DOI: 10.1080/2331186X.2020.1713427
ISSN: 2331-186X
Abstract: Student learning objectives (SLOs) have become an increasingly popular tool for teacher evaluations as an alternative to Value-added Models (VAMs). However, the use of SLOs faces two major challenges. First, the target setting is mostly subjective and arbitrary. Second, there is little evidence on the reliability and validity of the tool. In this paper, we proposed three data-based SLO target-setting models: split, banded, and class-wide models. The data-based approach ensures that the targets set for students are challenging yet realistic and achievable. Using data of 176 pre-kindergarten teachers and two cohorts of students from a large school district in Texas, we investigated the reliability and predictive validity of teachers' SLO scores. Results indicated that teachers' SLO scores had moderate to high consistency across different subtests, and moderate stability over time. Teachers' SLO scores were also demonstrated to be useful in predicting future students' achievement, which supported the predictive validity of the tool.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2021
Accession Number: EJ1282644
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:Student learning objectives (SLOs) have become an increasingly popular tool for teacher evaluations as an alternative to Value-added Models (VAMs). However, the use of SLOs faces two major challenges. First, the target setting is mostly subjective and arbitrary. Second, there is little evidence on the reliability and validity of the tool. In this paper, we proposed three data-based SLO target-setting models: split, banded, and class-wide models. The data-based approach ensures that the targets set for students are challenging yet realistic and achievable. Using data of 176 pre-kindergarten teachers and two cohorts of students from a large school district in Texas, we investigated the reliability and predictive validity of teachers' SLO scores. Results indicated that teachers' SLO scores had moderate to high consistency across different subtests, and moderate stability over time. Teachers' SLO scores were also demonstrated to be useful in predicting future students' achievement, which supported the predictive validity of the tool.
ISSN:2331-186X
DOI:10.1080/2331186X.2020.1713427