Performance of the Autism Observation Scale for Infants with Community-Ascertained Infants Showing Early Signs of Autism

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Performance of the Autism Observation Scale for Infants with Community-Ascertained Infants Showing Early Signs of Autism
Language: English
Authors: Hudry, Kristelle (ORCID 0000-0002-2752-8345), Chetcuti, Lacey, Boutrus, Maryam, Pillar, Sarah, Baker, Emma K., Dimov, Stefanie, Barbaro, Josephine (ORCID 0000-0001-7359-0097), Green, Jonathan, Whitehouse, Andrew J. O., Varcin, Kandice J.
Source: Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice. Feb 2021 25(2):490-501.
Availability: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 12
Publication Date: 2021
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Autism, Pervasive Developmental Disorders, Infants, At Risk Persons, Toddlers, Child Development, Siblings, Diagnostic Tests, Test Validity, Symptoms (Individual Disorders), Psychometrics, Foreign Countries, Child Behavior
Geographic Terms: Australia
Assessment and Survey Identifiers: Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Mullen Scales of Early Learning
DOI: 10.1177/1362361320965397
ISSN: 1362-3613
Abstract: Often included within 'high-risk sibling' studies, the Autism Observation Scale for Infants (AOSI) has only one independent replication study and no evaluation with community-ascertained cohorts. We administered the AOSI and established clinical measures with 103 infants (68% male) at 'high autism likelihood' on the Social Attention and Communication Surveillance - Revised (SACS-R) tool, at 9-14 months of age and again 6months later. AOSI Total scores showed adequate internal consistency and strong inter-rater agreement (live- or video-coded) and were approximately normally distributed at each visit. Modest significant associations presented between Time 1 AOSI scores and concurrent developmental/adaptive skills measures. Concurrent associations were stronger at Time 2, particularly between AOSI Total and Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) Social Affect scores. AOSI scores were only moderately associated across Time 1 and 2 assessments, as were Time 1 AOSI with Time 2 ADOS scores. These data from a clinically indicated cohort broadly replicate previous AOSI validity accounts from 'high-risk sibling' studies, particularly beyond the first year. Strong inter-rater agreement indicates viable AOSI inclusion within protocols necessitating blinded evaluation (e.g. intervention trials). Moderate within-participant stability suggests that, like 'high-risk siblings,' community-ascertained infants experience variable early trajectories. [This article was co-written by the AICES Team.]
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2021
Accession Number: EJ1285280
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Often included within 'high-risk sibling' studies, the Autism Observation Scale for Infants (AOSI) has only one independent replication study and no evaluation with community-ascertained cohorts. We administered the AOSI and established clinical measures with 103 infants (68% male) at 'high autism likelihood' on the Social Attention and Communication Surveillance - Revised (SACS-R) tool, at 9-14 months of age and again 6months later. AOSI Total scores showed adequate internal consistency and strong inter-rater agreement (live- or video-coded) and were approximately normally distributed at each visit. Modest significant associations presented between Time 1 AOSI scores and concurrent developmental/adaptive skills measures. Concurrent associations were stronger at Time 2, particularly between AOSI Total and Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) Social Affect scores. AOSI scores were only moderately associated across Time 1 and 2 assessments, as were Time 1 AOSI with Time 2 ADOS scores. These data from a clinically indicated cohort broadly replicate previous AOSI validity accounts from 'high-risk sibling' studies, particularly beyond the first year. Strong inter-rater agreement indicates viable AOSI inclusion within protocols necessitating blinded evaluation (e.g. intervention trials). Moderate within-participant stability suggests that, like 'high-risk siblings,' community-ascertained infants experience variable early trajectories. [This article was co-written by the AICES Team.]
ISSN:1362-3613
DOI:10.1177/1362361320965397