Cultivating Creative Thinking in Engineering Student Teams: Can a Computer-Mediated Virtual Laboratory Help?
Saved in:
| Title: | Cultivating Creative Thinking in Engineering Student Teams: Can a Computer-Mediated Virtual Laboratory Help? |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Hirshfield, Laura J. (ORCID |
| Source: | Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. Apr 2021 37(2):587-601. |
| Availability: | Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 15 |
| Publication Date: | 2021 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | National Science Foundation (NSF) |
| Contract Number: | 1519467 1160353 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Creative Thinking, Engineering Education, Cooperative Learning, Electronic Learning, Undergraduate Students, Student Projects, Laboratory Experiments |
| DOI: | 10.1111/jcal.12509 |
| ISSN: | 0266-4909 |
| Abstract: | In engineering design, engineers must be able to think creatively, effectively toggling between divergent thinking (developing multiple novel ideas) and convergent thinking (pursuing an appropriate idea using engineering analyses). However, creative thinking is not emphasized in many undergraduate engineering programs. In this empirical study, we analyze the divergent thinking of teams working on a virtual laboratory project. Fifteen student teams' solution paths--as represented by Model Maps--were analyzed to characterize and compare the various elements of divergent thinking: fluency, flexibility, and originality. The solution paths of these teams were compared in two physical laboratory projects and to experts completing the same virtual laboratory project. We found that students demonstrated more divergent thinking in the virtual laboratory project than in the physical laboratory projects; yet, divergent thinking and quality of solution did not correlate. There was little difference between measured elements of divergent thinking between student teams and experts. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2021 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1287866 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1287866 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Cultivating Creative Thinking in Engineering Student Teams: Can a Computer-Mediated Virtual Laboratory Help? – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hirshfield%2C+Laura+J%2E%22">Hirshfield, Laura J.</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6723-670X">0000-0002-6723-670X</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Koretsky%2C+Milo+D%2E%22">Koretsky, Milo D.</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6887-4527">0000-0002-6887-4527</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Computer+Assisted+Learning%22"><i>Journal of Computer Assisted Learning</i></searchLink>. Apr 2021 37(2):587-601. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 15 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2021 – Name: SourceSuprt Label: Sponsoring Agency Group: SrcSuprt Data: National Science Foundation (NSF) – Name: NumberContract Label: Contract Number Group: NumCntrct Data: 1519467<br />1160353 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Creative+Thinking%22">Creative Thinking</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Engineering+Education%22">Engineering Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cooperative+Learning%22">Cooperative Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Electronic+Learning%22">Electronic Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Undergraduate+Students%22">Undergraduate Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Projects%22">Student Projects</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Laboratory+Experiments%22">Laboratory Experiments</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1111/jcal.12509 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0266-4909 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: In engineering design, engineers must be able to think creatively, effectively toggling between divergent thinking (developing multiple novel ideas) and convergent thinking (pursuing an appropriate idea using engineering analyses). However, creative thinking is not emphasized in many undergraduate engineering programs. In this empirical study, we analyze the divergent thinking of teams working on a virtual laboratory project. Fifteen student teams' solution paths--as represented by Model Maps--were analyzed to characterize and compare the various elements of divergent thinking: fluency, flexibility, and originality. The solution paths of these teams were compared in two physical laboratory projects and to experts completing the same virtual laboratory project. We found that students demonstrated more divergent thinking in the virtual laboratory project than in the physical laboratory projects; yet, divergent thinking and quality of solution did not correlate. There was little difference between measured elements of divergent thinking between student teams and experts. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2021 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1287866 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1287866 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1111/jcal.12509 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 15 StartPage: 587 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Creative Thinking Type: general – SubjectFull: Engineering Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Cooperative Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Electronic Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Undergraduate Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Projects Type: general – SubjectFull: Laboratory Experiments Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Cultivating Creative Thinking in Engineering Student Teams: Can a Computer-Mediated Virtual Laboratory Help? Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Hirshfield, Laura J. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Koretsky, Milo D. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 04 Type: published Y: 2021 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0266-4909 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 37 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |