View in EDS PDF Full Text

Metacognitive Experience on Raven's Matrices versus Insight Problems

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Metacognitive Experience on Raven's Matrices versus Insight Problems
Language: English
Authors: Chuderski, Adam (ORCID 0000-0001-6198-6748), Jastrzebski, Jan, Kroczek, Bartlomiej, Kucwaj, Hanna, Ociepka, Michal
Source: Metacognition and Learning. Apr 2021 16(1):15-35.
Availability: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 21
Publication Date: 2021
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Metacognition, Intelligence Tests, Intuition, Difficulty Level, Problem Solving, Cognitive Processes
Assessment and Survey Identifiers: Raven Advanced Progressive Matrices
DOI: 10.1007/s11409-020-09236-6
ISSN: 1556-1623
Abstract: Participants rated Intuition, Suddenness, Pleasure, and Certainty accompanying their solutions to items of a popular fluid intelligence test -- Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (RAPM) -- that varied from easy (around 80% correct) to difficult (around 20% correct). The same ratings were collected from four insight problems interleaved with RAPM. Suddenness and Certainty substantially decreased from easy to difficult matrices (Pleasure strongly overlapped with Certainty). In easy matrices, subjective experience matched that observed during insight problems, suggesting the highly fluent processing resulting in vivid and univocal solutions. By contrast, processing difficult matrices seemed to involve effortful incremental combination of complex information that yielded uncertain outcomes, resembling full-blown analytic problems. Only Intuition, generally rated low, was unaffected by RAPM difficulty. These results suggest that RAPM constitutes a heterogeneous test, with easy vs. difficult items involving relatively distinct types of processing. This novel knowledge can help in understanding the processes underlying solving Raven's matrices. The study also contributes to the understanding of the validity of subjective ratings as measures of metacognition.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2021
Accession Number: EJ1289882
Database: ERIC
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
    Url: https://content.ebscohost.com/cds/retrieve?content=AQICAHj0k_4E0hTGH8RJwT4gCJyBsGNe_WN95AvKlDbXJGqwxwHnk-WLZf6iicgztS7dCzm4AAAA4zCB4AYJKoZIhvcNAQcGoIHSMIHPAgEAMIHJBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHgYJYIZIAWUDBAEuMBEEDBtFSe3dzzqkMHJPTQIBEICBm9Xa0O7veH8Vv4qtuz-vVEZz5y27QpsSBU-H7sZIndhdxMzy-YPe4B3522Qcnu8uRotjTSAO6460Fx7Vi6_gXojekscrJ1xCdvcbAi-W46G5aMBltB0XP1y2TaUXTE9urfM3VIApUyCO5YjnvzQ5HwjSooBc-ubq09r4wM-3pzmFGDXQuyWaCquuFtB-6CyOflPZ8mC3Vjzq1T7B
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1289882
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Metacognitive Experience on Raven's Matrices versus Insight Problems
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chuderski%2C+Adam%22">Chuderski, Adam</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6198-6748">0000-0001-6198-6748</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jastrzebski%2C+Jan%22">Jastrzebski, Jan</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kroczek%2C+Bartlomiej%22">Kroczek, Bartlomiej</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kucwaj%2C+Hanna%22">Kucwaj, Hanna</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ociepka%2C+Michal%22">Ociepka, Michal</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Metacognition+and+Learning%22"><i>Metacognition and Learning</i></searchLink>. Apr 2021 16(1):15-35.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 21
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2021
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Metacognition%22">Metacognition</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Intelligence+Tests%22">Intelligence Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Intuition%22">Intuition</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Difficulty+Level%22">Difficulty Level</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Problem+Solving%22">Problem Solving</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+Processes%22">Cognitive Processes</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectThesaurus
  Label: Assessment and Survey Identifiers
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Raven+Advanced+Progressive+Matrices%22">Raven Advanced Progressive Matrices</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1007/s11409-020-09236-6
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 1556-1623
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Participants rated Intuition, Suddenness, Pleasure, and Certainty accompanying their solutions to items of a popular fluid intelligence test -- Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (RAPM) -- that varied from easy (around 80% correct) to difficult (around 20% correct). The same ratings were collected from four insight problems interleaved with RAPM. Suddenness and Certainty substantially decreased from easy to difficult matrices (Pleasure strongly overlapped with Certainty). In easy matrices, subjective experience matched that observed during insight problems, suggesting the highly fluent processing resulting in vivid and univocal solutions. By contrast, processing difficult matrices seemed to involve effortful incremental combination of complex information that yielded uncertain outcomes, resembling full-blown analytic problems. Only Intuition, generally rated low, was unaffected by RAPM difficulty. These results suggest that RAPM constitutes a heterogeneous test, with easy vs. difficult items involving relatively distinct types of processing. This novel knowledge can help in understanding the processes underlying solving Raven's matrices. The study also contributes to the understanding of the validity of subjective ratings as measures of metacognition.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2021
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1289882
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1289882
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s11409-020-09236-6
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 21
        StartPage: 15
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Metacognition
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Intelligence Tests
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Intuition
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Difficulty Level
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Problem Solving
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cognitive Processes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Raven Advanced Progressive Matrices
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Metacognitive Experience on Raven's Matrices versus Insight Problems
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Chuderski, Adam
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Jastrzebski, Jan
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kroczek, Bartlomiej
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kucwaj, Hanna
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ociepka, Michal
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 04
              Type: published
              Y: 2021
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 1556-1623
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 16
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Metacognition and Learning
              Type: main
ResultId 1