What Do Students Know about Evolution by Natural Selection after a Non-Majors Geology Course? An Analysis of Student Responses to Open-Ended Questions

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: What Do Students Know about Evolution by Natural Selection after a Non-Majors Geology Course? An Analysis of Student Responses to Open-Ended Questions
Language: English
Authors: Harding, Rachel L. S., Williams, Kurt R. (ORCID 0000-0002-1795-8915), Forcino, Frank L., Dees, Jonathan, Pennaz, Madelyn, Momsen, Jennifer L. (ORCID 0000-0002-2570-4288)
Source: Journal of Geoscience Education. 2021 69(3):253-264.
Availability: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 12
Publication Date: 2021
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Evolution, Nonmajors, Geology, Scientific Principles, Science Instruction, Instructional Effectiveness, Knowledge Level, Undergraduate Students, Religious Factors, Rural Areas, Biology, College Science
DOI: 10.1080/10899995.2020.1838851
ISSN: 1089-9995
Abstract: Most of the research on student understanding of evolution by natural selection has focused on undergraduate biology courses for science majors. However, the majority of undergraduates in the United States will not enroll in a biology course for majors. In this study, we identify the extent of natural selection understanding that students acquire through an undergraduate, non-majors geology course. Using a pre/post assessment model, we administered open-response items from the Bishop and Anderson Diagnostic Instrument and a religiosity scale. Student responses were coded for inclusion and correctness of five key principles of natural selection: variation in a population, origin of variation, inheritance, fitness, and change in a population over time. The majority of students included few, if any, key principles of natural selection in their responses prior to instruction, and improvement after direct instruction in their geology course was minimal (cheetah: mean pre 1.01, mean post 1.37; salamander: mean pre 0.79, mean post 1.15). In most cases, students' self-reported religiosity was unrelated to their knowledge of natural selection. Together, our results demonstrate that in spite of instruction, non-majors geology students struggle to describe the process of natural selection using foundational principles. We encourage the continued development of cross-disciplinary educational resources for this important population to help all students, regardless of major or career path, gain a more robust understanding of evolution by natural selection.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2021
Accession Number: EJ1306245
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:Most of the research on student understanding of evolution by natural selection has focused on undergraduate biology courses for science majors. However, the majority of undergraduates in the United States will not enroll in a biology course for majors. In this study, we identify the extent of natural selection understanding that students acquire through an undergraduate, non-majors geology course. Using a pre/post assessment model, we administered open-response items from the Bishop and Anderson Diagnostic Instrument and a religiosity scale. Student responses were coded for inclusion and correctness of five key principles of natural selection: variation in a population, origin of variation, inheritance, fitness, and change in a population over time. The majority of students included few, if any, key principles of natural selection in their responses prior to instruction, and improvement after direct instruction in their geology course was minimal (cheetah: mean pre 1.01, mean post 1.37; salamander: mean pre 0.79, mean post 1.15). In most cases, students' self-reported religiosity was unrelated to their knowledge of natural selection. Together, our results demonstrate that in spite of instruction, non-majors geology students struggle to describe the process of natural selection using foundational principles. We encourage the continued development of cross-disciplinary educational resources for this important population to help all students, regardless of major or career path, gain a more robust understanding of evolution by natural selection.
ISSN:1089-9995
DOI:10.1080/10899995.2020.1838851