Perceived Programmatic and Institutional Fit for Faculty in Public Administration, Policy, and Affairs: An Empirical Study
Saved in:
| Title: | Perceived Programmatic and Institutional Fit for Faculty in Public Administration, Policy, and Affairs: An Empirical Study |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Williams, Adam (ORCID |
| Source: | Journal of Public Affairs Education. 2021 27(3):348-371. |
| Availability: | Taylor & Francis. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 24 |
| Publication Date: | 2021 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | College Faculty, Teacher Selection, Teacher Qualifications, Employment Qualifications, Teacher Characteristics, Public Affairs Education, Institutional Characteristics, Beginning Teachers, Job Applicants, Classification, Individual Differences |
| DOI: | 10.1080/15236803.2020.1798732 |
| ISSN: | 1523-6803 |
| Abstract: | This study undertakes an evaluation of candidates and their hireability within programmatic and institutional contexts. The focus is on applicant qualifications, characteristics, and perceived fit within the program and institution. A survey of program contacts for graduate programs in public affairs analyzes candidate hireability. Results indicate clear differences between programs with similar ranking and institutional differences from Carnegie Classifications, but with little clarity on the rationale for the differences. Likewise, findings emerge relating to publishing in discipline-specific academic journals and obtaining a doctorate from online institutions. Discussions focus on implications for programs, institutions, and applicants seeking their first appointment in higher education. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2021 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1310819 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| Abstract: | This study undertakes an evaluation of candidates and their hireability within programmatic and institutional contexts. The focus is on applicant qualifications, characteristics, and perceived fit within the program and institution. A survey of program contacts for graduate programs in public affairs analyzes candidate hireability. Results indicate clear differences between programs with similar ranking and institutional differences from Carnegie Classifications, but with little clarity on the rationale for the differences. Likewise, findings emerge relating to publishing in discipline-specific academic journals and obtaining a doctorate from online institutions. Discussions focus on implications for programs, institutions, and applicants seeking their first appointment in higher education. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1523-6803 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/15236803.2020.1798732 |
