Differences between Students with Emotional Disturbance, Learning Disabilities, and without Disabilities on the Five Dimensions of Emotional Disturbance

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Differences between Students with Emotional Disturbance, Learning Disabilities, and without Disabilities on the Five Dimensions of Emotional Disturbance
Language: English
Authors: Lambert, Matthew C., Cullinan, Douglas, Epstein, Michael H., Martin, Jodie
Source: Journal of Applied School Psychology. 2022 38(1):58-73.
Availability: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 16
Publication Date: 2022
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Elementary Secondary Education
Elementary Education
Secondary Education
Descriptors: Emotional Disturbances, Learning Disabilities, Students with Disabilities, Rating Scales, Scores, Differences, Elementary Secondary Education, Elementary School Students, Secondary School Students, Construct Validity
DOI: 10.1080/15377903.2021.1895399
ISSN: 1537-7903
Abstract: The present study investigated evidence of the construct validity of scores from the Scales for Assessing Emotional Disturbance Rating Scale (SAED-3 RS), which is designed to help identify emotional disturbance (ED) as defined by U.S. law and regulations. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the degree to which SAED-3 RS scores differed between students with school-identified ED, students with school-identified learning disabilities (LD), and students without disabilities. The sample consisted of 2,193 K-12 students from throughout the U.S. The findings supported three hypotheses related to evidence of construct validity: (1) students with ED would differ from students without disabilities on all five dimensions of the SAED-3 RS; (2) students with ED would differ from students with LD on all dimensions of the SAED-3 RS except for the Inability to Learn dimensions; and (3) students with LD would differ from students without disabilities on all five dimensions of the SAED-3 RS, but that these differences would be smaller than the differences between students with ED and students without disabilities. Implications for practice and directions for future research are also discussed.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2022
Accession Number: EJ1322467
Database: ERIC
Be the first to leave a comment!
You must be logged in first