Toward Institutionalizing Successful Innovations in the Academy

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Toward Institutionalizing Successful Innovations in the Academy
Language: English
Authors: Wise, Sarah B. (ORCID 0000-0003-2738-8191), Ngai, Courtney (ORCID 0000-0001-6177-0816), Corbo, Joel Christopher (ORCID 0000-0001-6255-041X), Gammon, Mark A., Rivard, Jaclyn K. (ORCID 0000-0002-5816-939X), Smith, Clara E. (ORCID 0000-0002-5378-2734)
Source: To Improve the Academy. Spr 2022 41(1):151-184.
Availability: Michigan Publishing. 839 Greene Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48104. Tel: 734-764-3417; e-mail: mpublishing@umich.edu; Web site: https://www.toimprovetheacademy.org/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 34
Publication Date: 2022
Sponsoring Agency: National Science Foundation (NSF)
Contract Number: 1626565
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Educational Innovation, Educational Change, Higher Education, Resource Centers, Departments, Change Agents, Stakeholders, Sustainability, Organizational Change, Program Design, Information Dissemination, Program Implementation, Program Evaluation, Outcomes of Education, Educational Finance
DOI: 10.3998/tia.481
ISSN: 2334-4822
Abstract: Due to the "wicked problem" of the Academy's resistance to innovation, new teaching and learning programs struggle to become integrated into the fabric of the Academy, which slows the uptake of evidence-based practices. This wicked problem is rooted in the lack of slow, intentional mechanisms for cultural change in the Academy. In this article, we analyze the institutionalization journey of the Departmental Action Team (DAT) project, which is a model for slow, intentional change. Over the last four years, partnering with two campus centers for teaching and learning (CTLs) allowed the DAT project to make institutionalization progress. This analysis is focused on the institutionalization activities of the DAT project team and their co-creation of value with diverse stakeholders across two institutions. Results of the analysis include the definition of seven areas of effort (Team Development, Program Design, Awareness Communication, Program Implementation, Program Assessment, Outcomes Communication, and Financial Stability) that are valuable for the institutionalization of innovative educational programs. Within each area of effort, we describe specific strategies for institutionalization progress. We also analyze the timing of different areas of effort and present a model describing the cycling between areas of effort over time. Throughout the analysis, we provide recommendations for CTL staff working to institutionalize innovations.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2022
Accession Number: EJ1349517
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:Due to the "wicked problem" of the Academy's resistance to innovation, new teaching and learning programs struggle to become integrated into the fabric of the Academy, which slows the uptake of evidence-based practices. This wicked problem is rooted in the lack of slow, intentional mechanisms for cultural change in the Academy. In this article, we analyze the institutionalization journey of the Departmental Action Team (DAT) project, which is a model for slow, intentional change. Over the last four years, partnering with two campus centers for teaching and learning (CTLs) allowed the DAT project to make institutionalization progress. This analysis is focused on the institutionalization activities of the DAT project team and their co-creation of value with diverse stakeholders across two institutions. Results of the analysis include the definition of seven areas of effort (Team Development, Program Design, Awareness Communication, Program Implementation, Program Assessment, Outcomes Communication, and Financial Stability) that are valuable for the institutionalization of innovative educational programs. Within each area of effort, we describe specific strategies for institutionalization progress. We also analyze the timing of different areas of effort and present a model describing the cycling between areas of effort over time. Throughout the analysis, we provide recommendations for CTL staff working to institutionalize innovations.
ISSN:2334-4822
DOI:10.3998/tia.481