Open Science and Single-Case Design Research
Saved in:
| Title: | Open Science and Single-Case Design Research |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Cook, Bryan G. (ORCID |
| Source: | Remedial and Special Education. Oct 2022 43(5):359-369. |
| Availability: | SAGE Publications and Hammill Institute on Disabilities. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 11 |
| Publication Date: | 2022 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Descriptive |
| Descriptors: | Credibility, Scientific Research, Research Reports, Evidence Based Practice, Research Methodology, Meta Analysis, Access to Information, Periodicals, Publications |
| DOI: | 10.1177/0741932521996452 |
| ISSN: | 0741-9325 1538-4756 |
| Abstract: | Research indicating many study results do not replicate has raised questions about the credibility of science and prompted concerns about a potential reproducibility crisis. Moreover, most published research is not freely accessible, which limits the potential impact of science. Open science, which aims to make the research process more open and reproducible, has been proposed as one approach to increase the credibility and impact of scientific research. Although relatively little attention has been paid to open science in relation to single-case design, we propose that open-science practices can be applied to enhance the credibility and impact of single-case design research. In this article, we discuss how open-science practices align with other recent developments in single-case design research, describe four prominent open-science practices (i.e., preregistration, registered reports, data and materials sharing, and open access), and discuss potential benefits and limitations of each practice for single-case design. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2022 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1350498 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| Abstract: | Research indicating many study results do not replicate has raised questions about the credibility of science and prompted concerns about a potential reproducibility crisis. Moreover, most published research is not freely accessible, which limits the potential impact of science. Open science, which aims to make the research process more open and reproducible, has been proposed as one approach to increase the credibility and impact of scientific research. Although relatively little attention has been paid to open science in relation to single-case design, we propose that open-science practices can be applied to enhance the credibility and impact of single-case design research. In this article, we discuss how open-science practices align with other recent developments in single-case design research, describe four prominent open-science practices (i.e., preregistration, registered reports, data and materials sharing, and open access), and discuss potential benefits and limitations of each practice for single-case design. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0741-9325 1538-4756 |
| DOI: | 10.1177/0741932521996452 |
