Gaze Patterns Enhance Response Prediction: More than Correct or Incorrect
Saved in:
| Title: | Gaze Patterns Enhance Response Prediction: More than Correct or Incorrect |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Becker, Sebastian (ORCID |
| Source: | Physical Review Physics Education Research. Jul-Dec 2022 18(2). |
| Availability: | American Physical Society. One Physics Ellipse 4th Floor, College Park, MD 20740-3844. Tel: 301-209-3200; Fax: 301-209-0865; e-mail: assocpub@aps.org; Web site: http://prst-per.aps.org |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 11 |
| Publication Date: | 2022 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | High Schools Secondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Foreign Countries, High School Students, Eye Movements, Visual Stimuli, Attention, Predictor Variables, Responses, Accuracy, Problem Solving, Motion, Biomechanics |
| Geographic Terms: | Germany, Switzerland |
| DOI: | 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.020107 |
| ISSN: | 2469-9896 |
| Abstract: | Eye tracking enables the reconstruction of eye movements and thus the analysis of visual information selection and integration processes during problem solving. In this way, learner-specific difficulties can be identified and problem-solving process can be adapted accordingly. For such an adaptation, the prediction of response behavior plays a crucial role. To predict whether a problem is solved correctly or incorrectly, the segmentation of the visual stimulus into specific areas of interest (AOIs) is particularly crucial for the quality of a prediction based on eye-tracking data. In the study presented here, the gaze data of N=115 students were analyzed while solving the Test of Understanding Graphs in Kinematics (TUG-K), a validated test instrument whose items include graphs of position, velocity, and acceleration versus time. For selected items, response accuracy was predicted based on visual attention using multiple logistic regression analysis, examining the influence of AOI segmentation. The prediction quality could be significantly improved when the diagram was not considered as contiguous AOI, but when it was divided into solution-relevant and solution-irrelevant areas. To verify that the AOIs selected by the regression algorithm are indeed relevant to the solution process, an expert rating was performed, which showed moderate to good agreement between the AOIs rated by the experts as relevant to the correct solution and the AOIs selected by the algorithm. There are also pairs of items in the TUG-K that require the same mathematical solution procedure but differ in the physical context. This opened the possibility to investigate a new approach. Based on response accuracy and allocation of visual attention to one item, the response accuracy of the other item of the pair was predicted. It could be shown that the prediction quality based on visual attention was significantly higher than the prediction based on response accuracy. This demonstrates the added value of collecting process-based data versus product-based data for prediction and thus for learner-specific adaptation. The results of this study indicate, first, that only certain areas are crucial for a correct solution when extracting information from diagrams and, second, that the application of mathematical procedures plays a crucial role in interpreting graphs of different physics quantities. These findings thus provide insight into the visual strategies involved in interpreting kinematic diagrams and can also serve as a basis for eye tracking-based adaptation of problem-solving processes, in which adaptation can occur even before an incorrect answer is given. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2022 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1354783 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1354783 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Gaze Patterns Enhance Response Prediction: More than Correct or Incorrect – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Becker%2C+Sebastian%22">Becker, Sebastian</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2461-0992">0000-0002-2461-0992</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Küchemann%2C+Stefan%22">Küchemann, Stefan</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Klein%2C+Pascal%22">Klein, Pascal</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3023-1478">0000-0003-3023-1478</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lichtenberger%2C+Andreas%22">Lichtenberger, Andreas</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7739-3904">0000-0001-7739-3904</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kuhn%2C+Jochen%22">Kuhn, Jochen</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Physical+Review+Physics+Education+Research%22"><i>Physical Review Physics Education Research</i></searchLink>. Jul-Dec 2022 18(2). – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: American Physical Society. One Physics Ellipse 4th Floor, College Park, MD 20740-3844. Tel: 301-209-3200; Fax: 301-209-0865; e-mail: assocpub@aps.org; Web site: http://prst-per.aps.org – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 11 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2022 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22High+Schools%22">High Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Secondary+Education%22">Secondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22High+School+Students%22">High School Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Eye+Movements%22">Eye Movements</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Visual+Stimuli%22">Visual Stimuli</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Attention%22">Attention</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Predictor+Variables%22">Predictor Variables</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Responses%22">Responses</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Accuracy%22">Accuracy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Problem+Solving%22">Problem Solving</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Motion%22">Motion</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Biomechanics%22">Biomechanics</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Germany%22">Germany</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Switzerland%22">Switzerland</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.020107 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2469-9896 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Eye tracking enables the reconstruction of eye movements and thus the analysis of visual information selection and integration processes during problem solving. In this way, learner-specific difficulties can be identified and problem-solving process can be adapted accordingly. For such an adaptation, the prediction of response behavior plays a crucial role. To predict whether a problem is solved correctly or incorrectly, the segmentation of the visual stimulus into specific areas of interest (AOIs) is particularly crucial for the quality of a prediction based on eye-tracking data. In the study presented here, the gaze data of N=115 students were analyzed while solving the Test of Understanding Graphs in Kinematics (TUG-K), a validated test instrument whose items include graphs of position, velocity, and acceleration versus time. For selected items, response accuracy was predicted based on visual attention using multiple logistic regression analysis, examining the influence of AOI segmentation. The prediction quality could be significantly improved when the diagram was not considered as contiguous AOI, but when it was divided into solution-relevant and solution-irrelevant areas. To verify that the AOIs selected by the regression algorithm are indeed relevant to the solution process, an expert rating was performed, which showed moderate to good agreement between the AOIs rated by the experts as relevant to the correct solution and the AOIs selected by the algorithm. There are also pairs of items in the TUG-K that require the same mathematical solution procedure but differ in the physical context. This opened the possibility to investigate a new approach. Based on response accuracy and allocation of visual attention to one item, the response accuracy of the other item of the pair was predicted. It could be shown that the prediction quality based on visual attention was significantly higher than the prediction based on response accuracy. This demonstrates the added value of collecting process-based data versus product-based data for prediction and thus for learner-specific adaptation. The results of this study indicate, first, that only certain areas are crucial for a correct solution when extracting information from diagrams and, second, that the application of mathematical procedures plays a crucial role in interpreting graphs of different physics quantities. These findings thus provide insight into the visual strategies involved in interpreting kinematic diagrams and can also serve as a basis for eye tracking-based adaptation of problem-solving processes, in which adaptation can occur even before an incorrect answer is given. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2022 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1354783 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1354783 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.020107 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 11 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: High School Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Eye Movements Type: general – SubjectFull: Visual Stimuli Type: general – SubjectFull: Attention Type: general – SubjectFull: Predictor Variables Type: general – SubjectFull: Responses Type: general – SubjectFull: Accuracy Type: general – SubjectFull: Problem Solving Type: general – SubjectFull: Motion Type: general – SubjectFull: Biomechanics Type: general – SubjectFull: Germany Type: general – SubjectFull: Switzerland Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Gaze Patterns Enhance Response Prediction: More than Correct or Incorrect Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Becker, Sebastian – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Küchemann, Stefan – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Klein, Pascal – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Lichtenberger, Andreas – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kuhn, Jochen IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2022 Identifiers: – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2469-9896 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 18 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Physical Review Physics Education Research Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |