Strengthening Internal Accountability by Avoiding Fantasy Documents in Responsibility Center Budgeting

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Strengthening Internal Accountability by Avoiding Fantasy Documents in Responsibility Center Budgeting
Language: English
Authors: Harris, Nathan F.
Source: New Directions for Higher Education. Sum 2022 (198):63-74.
Availability: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 12
Publication Date: 2022
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Accountability, Research Universities, Public Colleges, Budgeting, Educational Finance, Models, Decision Making
DOI: 10.1002/he.20442
ISSN: 0271-0560
1536-0741
Abstract: Higher education scholars often investigate the policy mechanisms of external accountability, but rarely explore institutional mechanisms of internal accountability. This chapter, which reports select findings from an in-depth case study of institutional budgeting at an American public research university, examines an underexplored mechanism of internal accountability -- annual budget reviews. The findings illustrate that the university's budget review often constitutes a fantasy practice that affirms the institution's commitment to fiscal prudence as much as scrutinizes budgetary decisions in academic units. The findings reveal opportunities to strengthen budget reviews at institutions that have adopted decentralized budget models such as Responsibility Center Budgeting.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2022
Accession Number: EJ1355014
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Higher education scholars often investigate the policy mechanisms of external accountability, but rarely explore institutional mechanisms of internal accountability. This chapter, which reports select findings from an in-depth case study of institutional budgeting at an American public research university, examines an underexplored mechanism of internal accountability -- annual budget reviews. The findings illustrate that the university's budget review often constitutes a fantasy practice that affirms the institution's commitment to fiscal prudence as much as scrutinizes budgetary decisions in academic units. The findings reveal opportunities to strengthen budget reviews at institutions that have adopted decentralized budget models such as Responsibility Center Budgeting.
ISSN:0271-0560
1536-0741
DOI:10.1002/he.20442