Effects of Transitional Elements on Listeners' Aesthetic Responses to a Choral Performance

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Effects of Transitional Elements on Listeners' Aesthetic Responses to a Choral Performance
Language: English
Authors: Adams, Kari (ORCID 0000-0002-5645-8817), Springer, D. Gregory (ORCID 0000-0001-7923-726X), Geringer, John M., Nápoles, Jessica (ORCID 0000-0003-1512-8587), Davis, M. Nicole
Source: Journal of Research in Music Education. Apr 2023 71(1):111-128.
Availability: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 18
Publication Date: 2023
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Singing, Music Activities, Music Education, Comparative Analysis, Aesthetics, Performance, Teaching Methods, Learning Processes, Audio Equipment, Video Technology, Majors (Students), Music Therapy, Graduate Students, Undergraduate Students, Student Attitudes
DOI: 10.1177/00224294221111715
ISSN: 0022-4294
1945-0095
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of transitional elements on listeners' aesthetic responses. Participants (N = 81) viewed an excerpt of a choral performance while manipulating a Continuous Response Digital Interface to record their aesthetic responses. Participants in one group viewed the original choral performance, which included two purposeful transitions and no applause between pieces. In the other group, participants viewed the same choral performance but with applause over a black screen added between pieces. Participants then answered two open-ended questions to indicate the features of the performance most salient to their aesthetic responses. Mean aesthetic responses during each transition were higher for the continuous transition group compared to the applause group; however, differences between groups were statistically significant only during the attacca transition between the second and third piece. In response to "What factors contributed the most to your aesthetic response?" participants most commonly cited ensemble musicianship, followed by compositional elements such as harmonic, melodic, or rhythmic material; performer engagement; and song choices. When describing what kept them most engaged, participants mentioned programming most frequently, with the majority of comments referencing variety. We discuss implications for music teaching and learning.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2023
Accession Number: EJ1367074
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of transitional elements on listeners' aesthetic responses. Participants (N = 81) viewed an excerpt of a choral performance while manipulating a Continuous Response Digital Interface to record their aesthetic responses. Participants in one group viewed the original choral performance, which included two purposeful transitions and no applause between pieces. In the other group, participants viewed the same choral performance but with applause over a black screen added between pieces. Participants then answered two open-ended questions to indicate the features of the performance most salient to their aesthetic responses. Mean aesthetic responses during each transition were higher for the continuous transition group compared to the applause group; however, differences between groups were statistically significant only during the attacca transition between the second and third piece. In response to "What factors contributed the most to your aesthetic response?" participants most commonly cited ensemble musicianship, followed by compositional elements such as harmonic, melodic, or rhythmic material; performer engagement; and song choices. When describing what kept them most engaged, participants mentioned programming most frequently, with the majority of comments referencing variety. We discuss implications for music teaching and learning.
ISSN:0022-4294
1945-0095
DOI:10.1177/00224294221111715