Embedding a Proof-of-Concept Test in an At-Scale National Policy Experiment: Greater Policy Learning but at What Cost to Statistical Power? The Social Security Administration's Benefit Offset National Demonstration (BOND)
Saved in:
| Title: | Embedding a Proof-of-Concept Test in an At-Scale National Policy Experiment: Greater Policy Learning but at What Cost to Statistical Power? The Social Security Administration's Benefit Offset National Demonstration (BOND) |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Bell, Stephen H. (ORCID |
| Source: | American Journal of Evaluation. Mar 2023 44(1):118-132. |
| Availability: | SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 15 |
| Publication Date: | 2023 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Descriptive |
| Descriptors: | Public Policy, Policy Formation, Federal Programs, Social Services, Disabilities, Insurance, Research Design, Statistical Analysis, Costs, Volunteers, Program Effectiveness, Evidence, Program Evaluation |
| DOI: | 10.1177/10982140211006786 |
| ISSN: | 1098-2140 1557-0878 |
| Abstract: | A randomized experiment that measures the impact of a social policy in a sample of the population reveals whether the policy will work on average with universal application. An experiment that includes only the subset of the population that volunteers for the intervention generates narrower "proof-of-concept" evidence of whether the policy can work for motivated individuals. Both forms of learning carry value, yet evaluations rarely combine the two designs. The U.S. Social Security Administration conducted an exception, the Benefit Offset National Demonstration (BOND). This article uses BOND to examine the statistical power implications and potential gains in policy learning--relative to costs--from combining volunteer and population-representative experiments. It finds that minimum detectable effects of volunteer experiments rise little when one adds a population-representative experiment, but those of a population-representative experiment double or quadruple with the addition of a volunteer experiment. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2023 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1374477 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1374477 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Embedding a Proof-of-Concept Test in an At-Scale National Policy Experiment: Greater Policy Learning but at What Cost to Statistical Power? The Social Security Administration's Benefit Offset National Demonstration (BOND) – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bell%2C+Stephen+H%2E%22">Bell, Stephen H.</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2286-5887">0000-0002-2286-5887</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Stapleton%2C+David+C%2E%22">Stapleton, David C.</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9147-3046">0000-0001-9147-3046</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wood%2C+Michelle%22">Wood, Michelle</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gubits%2C+Daniel%22">Gubits, Daniel</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22American+Journal+of+Evaluation%22"><i>American Journal of Evaluation</i></searchLink>. Mar 2023 44(1):118-132. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 15 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2023 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Descriptive – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+Policy%22">Public Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Policy+Formation%22">Policy Formation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Federal+Programs%22">Federal Programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+Services%22">Social Services</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Disabilities%22">Disabilities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Insurance%22">Insurance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+Design%22">Research Design</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+Analysis%22">Statistical Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Costs%22">Costs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Volunteers%22">Volunteers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Effectiveness%22">Program Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evidence%22">Evidence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Evaluation%22">Program Evaluation</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1177/10982140211006786 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1098-2140<br />1557-0878 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: A randomized experiment that measures the impact of a social policy in a sample of the population reveals whether the policy will work on average with universal application. An experiment that includes only the subset of the population that volunteers for the intervention generates narrower "proof-of-concept" evidence of whether the policy can work for motivated individuals. Both forms of learning carry value, yet evaluations rarely combine the two designs. The U.S. Social Security Administration conducted an exception, the Benefit Offset National Demonstration (BOND). This article uses BOND to examine the statistical power implications and potential gains in policy learning--relative to costs--from combining volunteer and population-representative experiments. It finds that minimum detectable effects of volunteer experiments rise little when one adds a population-representative experiment, but those of a population-representative experiment double or quadruple with the addition of a volunteer experiment. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2023 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1374477 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1374477 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1177/10982140211006786 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 15 StartPage: 118 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Public Policy Type: general – SubjectFull: Policy Formation Type: general – SubjectFull: Federal Programs Type: general – SubjectFull: Social Services Type: general – SubjectFull: Disabilities Type: general – SubjectFull: Insurance Type: general – SubjectFull: Research Design Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistical Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Costs Type: general – SubjectFull: Volunteers Type: general – SubjectFull: Program Effectiveness Type: general – SubjectFull: Evidence Type: general – SubjectFull: Program Evaluation Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Embedding a Proof-of-Concept Test in an At-Scale National Policy Experiment: Greater Policy Learning but at What Cost to Statistical Power? The Social Security Administration's Benefit Offset National Demonstration (BOND) Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Bell, Stephen H. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Stapleton, David C. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Wood, Michelle – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Gubits, Daniel IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 03 Type: published Y: 2023 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1098-2140 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1557-0878 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 44 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: American Journal of Evaluation Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |