Reliability and Validity of the School Function Assessment for Children with Disabilities in Korea: Applying Rasch Analysis
Saved in:
| Title: | Reliability and Validity of the School Function Assessment for Children with Disabilities in Korea: Applying Rasch Analysis |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Kim, Hun Ju (ORCID |
| Source: | International Journal of Disability, Development and Education. 2023 70(1):32-44. |
| Availability: | Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 13 |
| Publication Date: | 2023 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Elementary Education |
| Descriptors: | Foreign Countries, Test Validity, Test Reliability, Occupational Therapy, Students with Disabilities, Intellectual Disability, Elementary School Students, Test Items, Difficulty Level, Rating Scales, Symptoms (Individual Disorders), Physical Disabilities, Ability |
| Geographic Terms: | South Korea |
| DOI: | 10.1080/1034912X.2020.1870665 |
| ISSN: | 1034-912X 1465-346X |
| Abstract: | This study verified validity and reliability of the School Function Assessment (SFA) using Rasch analysis in South Korean school-based occupational therapy sites serving children with intellectual disabilities and others. Participants were 103 elementary school children (grades 1 through 6) with disabilities. Rasch analysis revealed several misfitting items. Difficulty levels of items, presented in hierarchical order, were very different from those found at the time of development of the SFA. Results for the rating scale fit showed that a 4-point scale, rather than the existing 6-point scale, was more appropriate for several parts of the SFA in the Korean context. Separation reliability ranged from good to very good, with coefficients from 0.85 to 0.99. This study contributes to the literature by verifying the reliability and validity of the SFA for students who need school-based occupational therapy in Korea using Rasch analysis, with a focus on applying it to children with intellectual disabilities and autistic spectrum disorders. For more efficient application of the SFA in South Korea in the future, it remains necessary to modify the misfitting items, rearrange their difficulty levels, and properly adjust the rating scales rather than evaluating items by literally translating them into Korean. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2023 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1376870 |
| Database: | ERIC |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | This study verified validity and reliability of the School Function Assessment (SFA) using Rasch analysis in South Korean school-based occupational therapy sites serving children with intellectual disabilities and others. Participants were 103 elementary school children (grades 1 through 6) with disabilities. Rasch analysis revealed several misfitting items. Difficulty levels of items, presented in hierarchical order, were very different from those found at the time of development of the SFA. Results for the rating scale fit showed that a 4-point scale, rather than the existing 6-point scale, was more appropriate for several parts of the SFA in the Korean context. Separation reliability ranged from good to very good, with coefficients from 0.85 to 0.99. This study contributes to the literature by verifying the reliability and validity of the SFA for students who need school-based occupational therapy in Korea using Rasch analysis, with a focus on applying it to children with intellectual disabilities and autistic spectrum disorders. For more efficient application of the SFA in South Korea in the future, it remains necessary to modify the misfitting items, rearrange their difficulty levels, and properly adjust the rating scales rather than evaluating items by literally translating them into Korean. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1034-912X 1465-346X |
| DOI: | 10.1080/1034912X.2020.1870665 |
