Are Goats 'Chèvres,' 'Chévres,' 'Chevres,' and 'Chevres'? Unveiling the Orthographic Code of Diacritical Vowels

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Are Goats 'Chèvres,' 'Chévres,' 'Chevres,' and 'Chevres'? Unveiling the Orthographic Code of Diacritical Vowels
Language: English
Authors: Labusch, Melanie, Massol, Stéphanie, Marcet, Ana, Perea, Manuel (ORCID 0000-0002-3291-1365)
Source: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Feb 2023 49(2):301-319.
Availability: American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 19
Publication Date: 2023
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Vowels, Distinctive Features (Language), French, Pronunciation, Word Recognition, Reading Processes, Alphabets, Suprasegmentals, Phonology, Phonemes, Comparative Analysis, Semantics, Classification, Task Analysis, Contrastive Linguistics, Reaction Time, Accuracy
DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001212
ISSN: 0278-7393
1939-1285
Abstract: An often overlooked but fundamental issue for any comprehensive model of visual-word recognition is the representation of diacritical vowels: Do diacritical and nondiacritical vowels share their abstract letter representations? Recent research suggests that the answer is "yes" in languages where diacritics indicate suprasegmental information (e.g., lexical stress, as in cámara ['ka.ma.[voiced alveolar tap or flap]a] camera; Spanish), but "no" in languages where diacritics indicate segmental information such as a different phoneme (e.g., the German vowels ä /[open-mid front unrounded vowel]/ and a /a/). Here we examined this issue in French, a language that contains a complex set of diacritical vowels (e.g., for the letter e: é, è, ê, and ë). In Experiment 1, using a semantic categorization task, we compared the word identification times to intact diacritical words (e.g., chèvre, goat in English) with a condition with omitted diacritics (chevre). Results showed that the two conditions behaved similarly. In Experiments 2-4, we compared the intact diacritical words with a condition containing a mismatching diacritic, either existing in French (e.g., chévre, chevre) or not (the macron sign, as in chevre). We only found a reading cost when replacing the diacritic with an existing one. In Experiments 5-6, we compared the semantic categorization times to intact nondiacritical words (e.g., cheval, horse in English) versus a condition with an added diacritic, either existing (chèval) or not (cheval). We found a reading cost for the words with the added diacritical mark in both cases. We discuss how models of visual-word recognition can be modified to represent diacritical vowels.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2023
Accession Number: EJ1377760
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:An often overlooked but fundamental issue for any comprehensive model of visual-word recognition is the representation of diacritical vowels: Do diacritical and nondiacritical vowels share their abstract letter representations? Recent research suggests that the answer is "yes" in languages where diacritics indicate suprasegmental information (e.g., lexical stress, as in cámara ['ka.ma.[voiced alveolar tap or flap]a] camera; Spanish), but "no" in languages where diacritics indicate segmental information such as a different phoneme (e.g., the German vowels ä /[open-mid front unrounded vowel]/ and a /a/). Here we examined this issue in French, a language that contains a complex set of diacritical vowels (e.g., for the letter e: é, è, ê, and ë). In Experiment 1, using a semantic categorization task, we compared the word identification times to intact diacritical words (e.g., chèvre, goat in English) with a condition with omitted diacritics (chevre). Results showed that the two conditions behaved similarly. In Experiments 2-4, we compared the intact diacritical words with a condition containing a mismatching diacritic, either existing in French (e.g., chévre, chevre) or not (the macron sign, as in chevre). We only found a reading cost when replacing the diacritic with an existing one. In Experiments 5-6, we compared the semantic categorization times to intact nondiacritical words (e.g., cheval, horse in English) versus a condition with an added diacritic, either existing (chèval) or not (cheval). We found a reading cost for the words with the added diacritical mark in both cases. We discuss how models of visual-word recognition can be modified to represent diacritical vowels.
ISSN:0278-7393
1939-1285
DOI:10.1037/xlm0001212