The Video Engagement Scale (VES): Measurement Properties of the Full and Shortened VES across Studies

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Video Engagement Scale (VES): Measurement Properties of the Full and Shortened VES across Studies
Language: English
Authors: Lehmann, Vicky (ORCID 0000-0003-4898-3176), Hillen, Marij A. (ORCID 0000-0001-5724-7934), Verdam, Mathilde G. E. (ORCID 0000-0002-2479-8817), Pieterse, Arwen H. (ORCID 0000-0001-6395-0052), Labrie, Nanon H. M. (ORCID 0000-0002-5483-0152), Fruijtier, Agnetha D. (ORCID 0000-0003-0434-0101), Oreel, Tom H., Smets, Ellen M. A. (ORCID 0000-0002-8145-8595), Visser, Leonie N. C. (ORCID 0000-0003-3487-7938)
Source: International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2023 26(3):305-318.
Availability: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 14
Publication Date: 2023
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Likert Scales, Video Technology, Vignettes, Construct Validity, Test Reliability, Error of Measurement, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Gender Differences, Educational Attainment, Psychometrics, Scores, Psychological Patterns, Diseases, Health, College Students, Foreign Countries
Geographic Terms: Netherlands
DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2022.2052697
ISSN: 1364-5579
1464-5300
Abstract: The Video Engagement Scale (VES) is a quality indicator to assess engagement in experimental video-vignette studies, but its measurement properties warrant improvement. Data from previous studies were combined (N = 2676) and split into three subsamples for a stepped analytical approach. We tested construct validity, criterion validity, reliability, and measurement invariance. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) reiterated poor fit of the previously suggested subscales. An alternative 2-factor structure is presented, which was cross-validated and further shortened (VES-sf). Reliability of both subscales ("Immersion," "Emotional Impact") was very high ([alpha] > 0.86). Multi-group CFAs demonstrated partial and complete measurement invariance among male/female and differently educated participants respectively. Invariance between healthy versus ill participants was not established, but CFAs supported the VES-sf structure in both groups separately. To conclude, we provide the VES-sf with sound measurement properties and demonstrated the appropriateness of comparing certain subgroups. Overall, we recommend the VES-sf to assess engagement/ecological validity in video-vignette research.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2023
Accession Number: EJ1387392
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:The Video Engagement Scale (VES) is a quality indicator to assess engagement in experimental video-vignette studies, but its measurement properties warrant improvement. Data from previous studies were combined (N = 2676) and split into three subsamples for a stepped analytical approach. We tested construct validity, criterion validity, reliability, and measurement invariance. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) reiterated poor fit of the previously suggested subscales. An alternative 2-factor structure is presented, which was cross-validated and further shortened (VES-sf). Reliability of both subscales ("Immersion," "Emotional Impact") was very high ([alpha] > 0.86). Multi-group CFAs demonstrated partial and complete measurement invariance among male/female and differently educated participants respectively. Invariance between healthy versus ill participants was not established, but CFAs supported the VES-sf structure in both groups separately. To conclude, we provide the VES-sf with sound measurement properties and demonstrated the appropriateness of comparing certain subgroups. Overall, we recommend the VES-sf to assess engagement/ecological validity in video-vignette research.
ISSN:1364-5579
1464-5300
DOI:10.1080/13645579.2022.2052697