Proof and Proving in School and University Mathematics Education Research: A Systematic Review

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Proof and Proving in School and University Mathematics Education Research: A Systematic Review
Language: English
Authors: Gabriel J. Stylianides (ORCID 0000-0003-1770-8753), Andreas J. Stylianides (ORCID 0000-0002-3526-0342), Andreas Moutsios-Rentzos (ORCID 0000-0002-9614-2825)
Source: ZDM: Mathematics Education. 2024 56(1):47-59.
Availability: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 13
Publication Date: 2024
Document Type: Journal Articles
Information Analyses
Education Level: Elementary Secondary Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Mathematics Education, Validity, Mathematical Logic, Educational Research, Elementary Secondary Education, Postsecondary Education
DOI: 10.1007/s11858-023-01518-y
ISSN: 1863-9690
1863-9704
Abstract: This systematic review aims to provide a complementary to existing synopses of the state-of-the-art of mathematics education research on "proof" and "proving" in both school and university mathematics. As an organizing framework, we used Cohen et al.'s triadic conceptualization of instruction, which draws attention not only to the main actors of the didactical process (i.e., the "Teacher" and "Students") and the "Content" around which the actors' work is organized (herein, content related to proof and proving), but also to the relationships among the actors and the content. Out of the 103 papers we reviewed, almost half fell in the Student-Content category, which is consistent with the existence of a substantial number of frameworks, methods, and research findings related to students' engagement with proof and proving. About a quarter of the papers fell in the Student-Teacher-Content category, which reflects an emphasis on viewing instructional practice in proof and proving in a holistic, systemic way. Only few papers fell in the categories that did not include Content in them, namely, the categories of Student, Teacher, and Student--Teacher; this suggests mathematics education research on proof and proving has a strong disciplinary identity, which potentially differentiates it from other mathematics education research strands. About a fifth of the papers were oriented towards 'breaking ground' through making an explicit theoretical and/or methodological contribution (Student-Teacher-Content and Content were the main categories where such contributions appeared), whilst the majority of the papers were focused on 'building ground' through elaborating or employing existing methodological and/or theoretical approaches.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2024
Accession Number: EJ1407838
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1407838
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Proof and Proving in School and University Mathematics Education Research: A Systematic Review
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gabriel+J%2E+Stylianides%22">Gabriel J. Stylianides</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1770-8753">0000-0003-1770-8753</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Andreas+J%2E+Stylianides%22">Andreas J. Stylianides</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3526-0342">0000-0002-3526-0342</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Andreas+Moutsios-Rentzos%22">Andreas Moutsios-Rentzos</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9614-2825">0000-0002-9614-2825</externalLink>)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22ZDM%3A+Mathematics+Education%22"><i>ZDM: Mathematics Education</i></searchLink>. 2024 56(1):47-59.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 13
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2024
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Information Analyses
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematics+Education%22">Mathematics Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Validity%22">Validity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematical+Logic%22">Mathematical Logic</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Research%22">Educational Research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1007/s11858-023-01518-y
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 1863-9690<br />1863-9704
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This systematic review aims to provide a complementary to existing synopses of the state-of-the-art of mathematics education research on "proof" and "proving" in both school and university mathematics. As an organizing framework, we used Cohen et al.'s triadic conceptualization of instruction, which draws attention not only to the main actors of the didactical process (i.e., the "Teacher" and "Students") and the "Content" around which the actors' work is organized (herein, content related to proof and proving), but also to the relationships among the actors and the content. Out of the 103 papers we reviewed, almost half fell in the Student-Content category, which is consistent with the existence of a substantial number of frameworks, methods, and research findings related to students' engagement with proof and proving. About a quarter of the papers fell in the Student-Teacher-Content category, which reflects an emphasis on viewing instructional practice in proof and proving in a holistic, systemic way. Only few papers fell in the categories that did not include Content in them, namely, the categories of Student, Teacher, and Student--Teacher; this suggests mathematics education research on proof and proving has a strong disciplinary identity, which potentially differentiates it from other mathematics education research strands. About a fifth of the papers were oriented towards 'breaking ground' through making an explicit theoretical and/or methodological contribution (Student-Teacher-Content and Content were the main categories where such contributions appeared), whilst the majority of the papers were focused on 'building ground' through elaborating or employing existing methodological and/or theoretical approaches.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2024
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1407838
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1407838
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s11858-023-01518-y
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 13
        StartPage: 47
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Mathematics Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Validity
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mathematical Logic
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Elementary Secondary Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Postsecondary Education
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Proof and Proving in School and University Mathematics Education Research: A Systematic Review
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gabriel J. Stylianides
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Andreas J. Stylianides
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Andreas Moutsios-Rentzos
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 1863-9690
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 1863-9704
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 56
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: ZDM: Mathematics Education
              Type: main
ResultId 1