Current Issues in Doctoral Supervision Practice in the UK

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Current Issues in Doctoral Supervision Practice in the UK
Language: English
Authors: Amanda Thomas (ORCID 0000-0003-4048-0347), Rhiannon Packer (ORCID 0000-0002-1976-8410), Gina Dolan (ORCID 0000-0003-3639-6505)
Source: Research in Post-Compulsory Education. 2024 29(1):158-188.
Availability: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 31
Publication Date: 2024
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Doctoral Students, Doctoral Programs, Supervision, Supervisor Supervisee Relationship, Student Attitudes, Role, Expectation, Supervisory Methods, COVID-19, Pandemics, Supervisors, Attitudes
Geographic Terms: United Kingdom
DOI: 10.1080/13596748.2023.2285634
ISSN: 1359-6748
1747-5112
Abstract: Doctoral study remains the most popular form of research degree globally. The student and supervisor relationship is an integral part of the postgraduate researcher (PGR) experience. Supervisory relationships can be complex and multi-faceted, with differing expectations from both supervisor and PGR. However, comparing different perspectives of the PGR supervisory journey is relatively unexplored. This study aimed to explore how both PGRs and supervisors perceive the evolution of supervisory relationships throughout the doctoral journey. Employing a mixed methods design, the findings indicate that there is a transition in the dynamics of the relationship between the supervisor and the student which changes during this process. The role of the supervisor moves from being a more knowledgeable other operating in an advisory capacity, described by one participant as a 'balance of expertise' that 'swings' as the relationship evolves. Drawing upon Jindal-Snape's multiple and multi-dimensional transitional theory, the results suggest that managing expectations, supporting the transition to doctoral study, the role of peer support for PGRs and supervisors are fundamental to a positive supervisory experience. The global pandemic affected the supervisory relationship and research journey posing some challenges for data collection; however, it facilitated opportunities to adapt and evolve supervisory practice.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2024
Accession Number: EJ1411501
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:Doctoral study remains the most popular form of research degree globally. The student and supervisor relationship is an integral part of the postgraduate researcher (PGR) experience. Supervisory relationships can be complex and multi-faceted, with differing expectations from both supervisor and PGR. However, comparing different perspectives of the PGR supervisory journey is relatively unexplored. This study aimed to explore how both PGRs and supervisors perceive the evolution of supervisory relationships throughout the doctoral journey. Employing a mixed methods design, the findings indicate that there is a transition in the dynamics of the relationship between the supervisor and the student which changes during this process. The role of the supervisor moves from being a more knowledgeable other operating in an advisory capacity, described by one participant as a 'balance of expertise' that 'swings' as the relationship evolves. Drawing upon Jindal-Snape's multiple and multi-dimensional transitional theory, the results suggest that managing expectations, supporting the transition to doctoral study, the role of peer support for PGRs and supervisors are fundamental to a positive supervisory experience. The global pandemic affected the supervisory relationship and research journey posing some challenges for data collection; however, it facilitated opportunities to adapt and evolve supervisory practice.
ISSN:1359-6748
1747-5112
DOI:10.1080/13596748.2023.2285634