The Importance of Seeking Feedback for Benefiting from Feedback: A Case of Second Language Writing

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Importance of Seeking Feedback for Benefiting from Feedback: A Case of Second Language Writing
Language: English
Authors: Mostafa Papi (ORCID 0000-0003-4309-0483), Mahmoud Abdi Tabari (ORCID 0000-0002-8022-5415), Masatoshi Sato (ORCID 0000-0001-7111-3406)
Source: Modern Language Journal. 2024 108(2):489-512.
Availability: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 24
Publication Date: 2024
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, English (Second Language), Teaching Methods, Educational Benefits, Writing Instruction, Essays, Error Correction, Writing Evaluation, Writing Improvement, Language Usage, Vocabulary Skills, Prediction, Revision (Written Composition), Undergraduate Students
DOI: 10.1111/modl.12923
ISSN: 0026-7902
1540-4781
Abstract: This study explored the role of feedback-seeking behaviors (FSB) in how English-as-a-second language (ESL) learners benefit from written corrective feedback (WCF). Seventy-six learners enrolled in an ESL writing course at a major university in the United States completed an FSB questionnaire, wrote a narrative essay, received WCF on their essays, and were given the opportunity to seek further feedback while revising their essays. Five writing measures were used to assess the quality of the revised essays and code the WCF provided. Paired-samples t-tests showed that the students made statistically significant improvements in all but one (content) of the target measures. Multiple regression analyses showed that WCF predicted improvements in only one measure (language use), whereas the learners' feedback monitoring (an implicit feedback-seeking strategy involving attending to, processing, and using feedback) predicted the organization, vocabulary, language use, mechanics, as well as the overall quality of the students' revisions. The results suggest that students benefit from WCF only if they seek, process, and use it. These findings confirmed the importance of feedback monitoring in how students benefit from WCF and support a learner-centered perspective that views students as proactive agents in the feedback process. Theoretical and pedagogical implications are discussed.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2024
Accession Number: EJ1425026
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:This study explored the role of feedback-seeking behaviors (FSB) in how English-as-a-second language (ESL) learners benefit from written corrective feedback (WCF). Seventy-six learners enrolled in an ESL writing course at a major university in the United States completed an FSB questionnaire, wrote a narrative essay, received WCF on their essays, and were given the opportunity to seek further feedback while revising their essays. Five writing measures were used to assess the quality of the revised essays and code the WCF provided. Paired-samples t-tests showed that the students made statistically significant improvements in all but one (content) of the target measures. Multiple regression analyses showed that WCF predicted improvements in only one measure (language use), whereas the learners' feedback monitoring (an implicit feedback-seeking strategy involving attending to, processing, and using feedback) predicted the organization, vocabulary, language use, mechanics, as well as the overall quality of the students' revisions. The results suggest that students benefit from WCF only if they seek, process, and use it. These findings confirmed the importance of feedback monitoring in how students benefit from WCF and support a learner-centered perspective that views students as proactive agents in the feedback process. Theoretical and pedagogical implications are discussed.
ISSN:0026-7902
1540-4781
DOI:10.1111/modl.12923