Making the (Letter) Grade: The Incentive Effects of Mandatory Pass/Fail Courses

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Making the (Letter) Grade: The Incentive Effects of Mandatory Pass/Fail Courses
Language: English
Authors: Kristin Butcher, Patrick J. McEwan, Akila Weerapana
Source: Education Finance and Policy. 2024 19(3):385-408.
Availability: MIT Press. 55 Hayward Street, Cambridge, MA 02142. Tel: 617-253-2889; Fax: 617-253-1709; e-mail: journals-rights@mit.edu; Web site: http://www.mitpressjournals.org/loi/edfp
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 34
Publication Date: 2024
Document Type: Journal Articles
Information Analyses
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Pass Fail Grading, College Freshmen, Courses, Grades (Scholastic), Academic Records, Course Selection (Students), Influences, Academic Achievement, STEM Education, Learner Engagement, Achievement Gains, Teacher Effectiveness, Incentives
Geographic Terms: Massachusetts
DOI: 10.1162/edfp_a_00401
ISSN: 1557-3060
1557-3079
Abstract: In fall 2014, Wellesley College began mandating pass/fail grading for courses taken by first year, first-semester students, although instructors continued to record letter grades. We identify the causal effect of the policy on course choice and performance, using a regression discontinuity-in-time design. Students shifted to lower-grading science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses in the first semester, but did not increase their engagement with STEM in later semesters. Letter grades of first-semester students declined by 0.13 grade points, or 23 percent of a standard deviation. We evaluate causal channels of the grade effect -- including sorting into lower-grading STEM courses and declining instructional quality -- and conclude that the effect is consistent with declining student effort.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2024
Accession Number: EJ1434301
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:In fall 2014, Wellesley College began mandating pass/fail grading for courses taken by first year, first-semester students, although instructors continued to record letter grades. We identify the causal effect of the policy on course choice and performance, using a regression discontinuity-in-time design. Students shifted to lower-grading science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses in the first semester, but did not increase their engagement with STEM in later semesters. Letter grades of first-semester students declined by 0.13 grade points, or 23 percent of a standard deviation. We evaluate causal channels of the grade effect -- including sorting into lower-grading STEM courses and declining instructional quality -- and conclude that the effect is consistent with declining student effort.
ISSN:1557-3060
1557-3079
DOI:10.1162/edfp_a_00401