View in EDS

Choices We Disagree With: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Sex Work within a Higher Education and Student Affairs Context

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Choices We Disagree With: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Sex Work within a Higher Education and Student Affairs Context
Language: English
Authors: Terah J. Stewart (ORCID 0000-0001-5205-0999), Chris Linder
Source: Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice. 2024 61(4):504-517.
Availability: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 14
Publication Date: 2024
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Student Personnel Services, Audio Equipment, Discourse Analysis, Discourse Modes, Rhetorical Criticism, Sexuality, Occupations, Higher Education, Social Bias, Student Employment, Audience Response
DOI: 10.1080/19496591.2023.2233446
ISSN: 1949-6591
1949-6605
Abstract: Using an episode of a student affairs podcast for professional development, we engage in a critical discourse analysis to better understand what discourses the podcast host and guest rely on when discussing college students engaged in sex work. Further, we examine how the discourses the host and guest use contribute to particular logics about sex workers by positioning them as a minoritized, stigmatized, and vulnerable population, which are more harmful than helpful.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2024
Accession Number: EJ1437806
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:Using an episode of a student affairs podcast for professional development, we engage in a critical discourse analysis to better understand what discourses the podcast host and guest rely on when discussing college students engaged in sex work. Further, we examine how the discourses the host and guest use contribute to particular logics about sex workers by positioning them as a minoritized, stigmatized, and vulnerable population, which are more harmful than helpful.
ISSN:1949-6591
1949-6605
DOI:10.1080/19496591.2023.2233446