Case-Based Reasoning in Educational Ethics: 'Phronesis' and Epistemic Blinders

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Case-Based Reasoning in Educational Ethics: 'Phronesis' and Epistemic Blinders
Language: English
Authors: Michael Vazquez, Dustin Webster
Source: Educational Theory. 2024 74(4):492-511.
Availability: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 20
Publication Date: 2024
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Evaluative
Descriptors: Case Method (Teaching Technique), Ethics, Ethical Instruction, Faculty Development, Epistemology, Abstract Reasoning, Educational Theories, Educational Philosophy
DOI: 10.1111/edth.12656
ISSN: 0013-2004
1741-5446
Abstract: In this paper Michael Vazquez and Dustin Webster consider the practice of deliberating about ethical case studies as a means to contribute to the professional development of educators. An ongoing debate is whether or not the study of ethical theory should be included in this practice. Vazquez and Webster argue that a popular strategy, known as the Phronetic Approach, is vulnerable to what they call "epistemic blinders" that arise in the absence of the scaffolding provided by theory. They then sketch an alternative approach to case-based reasoning inspired by Barbara Herman's notion of middle theory. The middle theory approach naturally suggests a balanced method for using case studies in teacher professional development: expose educators to some theory, but only to the degree and at the level appropriate for the specific audience and in light of how frequent interactions with that audience will be.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2024
Accession Number: EJ1440841
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Be the first to leave a comment!
You must be logged in first