Voicing Student Recovery: Embracing Diversity in Collegiate Recovery Programs
Saved in:
| Title: | Voicing Student Recovery: Embracing Diversity in Collegiate Recovery Programs |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Evelyn Vázquez (ORCID |
| Source: | Journal of American College Health. 2024 72(8):2546-2555. |
| Availability: | Taylor & Francis. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 10 |
| Publication Date: | 2024 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Diversity, Minority Groups, Barriers, Drug Addiction, Drug Rehabilitation, Alcohol Abuse, College Students, Intervention, Access to Health Care, Prevention, School Health Services, Student Needs, Cooperative Planning |
| DOI: | 10.1080/07448481.2022.2119400 |
| ISSN: | 0744-8481 1940-3208 |
| Abstract: | Objective: To discuss the engagement of patients and stakeholders (i.e., faculty, staff, healthcare providers, and university administrators) in capacity building activities to prepare for future patient-centered research on collegiate recovery. Participants: 502 attended capacity building activities and provided input on priorities for future research in collegiate recovery and 77 participated in the deliberative democracy forum process. Methods: We used surveys and the deliberative democracy forum method, which includes framing sessions and forums for data collection. This method enables individuals with diverse backgrounds to share and learn about differing viewpoints to build consensus for decision making. Results: Forum participants prioritized barriers to recovery for future research and discussed the need to address diversity in collegiate recovery programs, including racial/ethnic diversity in the student recovery population and diversity in pathways to recovery, to decrease barriers to recovery. Conclusions: Institutional support for research on collegiate recovery is critical to move the field forward. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2024 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1448356 |
| Database: | ERIC |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Objective: To discuss the engagement of patients and stakeholders (i.e., faculty, staff, healthcare providers, and university administrators) in capacity building activities to prepare for future patient-centered research on collegiate recovery. Participants: 502 attended capacity building activities and provided input on priorities for future research in collegiate recovery and 77 participated in the deliberative democracy forum process. Methods: We used surveys and the deliberative democracy forum method, which includes framing sessions and forums for data collection. This method enables individuals with diverse backgrounds to share and learn about differing viewpoints to build consensus for decision making. Results: Forum participants prioritized barriers to recovery for future research and discussed the need to address diversity in collegiate recovery programs, including racial/ethnic diversity in the student recovery population and diversity in pathways to recovery, to decrease barriers to recovery. Conclusions: Institutional support for research on collegiate recovery is critical to move the field forward. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0744-8481 1940-3208 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/07448481.2022.2119400 |
