Evaluation of the Application of the ACEP Cycle to Student Writing Learning Outcome
Saved in:
| Title: | Evaluation of the Application of the ACEP Cycle to Student Writing Learning Outcome |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Ryan Hidayat (ORCID |
| Source: | Journal of Education and e-Learning Research. 2024 11(4):667-675. |
| Availability: | Asian Online Journal Publishing Group. 244 Fifth Avenue Suite D42, New York, NY 10001. Fax: 212-591-6094; e-mail: info@asianonlinejournals.com; Web site: http://www.asianonlinejournals.com |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 9 |
| Publication Date: | 2024 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Junior High Schools Middle Schools Secondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Educational Strategies, Writing Skills, Student Improvement, Learning Processes, Activities, Discussion (Teaching Technique), Writing Exercises, Achievement, Student Attitudes, Teacher Attitudes, Junior High Schools, Junior High School Students, Junior High School Teachers, Independent Study, Curriculum, Foreign Countries, Teacher Role, Language Skills, Learning Theories |
| Geographic Terms: | Indonesia |
| ISSN: | 2518-0169 2410-9991 |
| Abstract: | The modification of the ACEP cycle is a pedagogical strategy consisting of four components: (A) Activities. (C) Classroom discussion. (E) Exercises. (P) Performance. The application of ACEP cycle modifications is used as a strategy to improve writing skills. This is the primary focus to consider in improving writing skills. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how effective the process of learning writing skills was by applying ACEP cycle modifications. This study used a mixed-methods approach. At the qualitative stage, an explanatory description design strategy is applied to collect comprehensive and in-depth information about the learning model applied by the teacher in the classroom. A pre- and post-test control group design is used in the quantitative stage. The average score of students using the ACEP cycle modification was 82.64, higher than that of students who studied under the demonstration learning model which was 80.03. This finding is reinforced by the result of the significance coefficient = 0.006 < 0.05 so H0 is rejected. Thus, there is a difference in average student learning outcomes between the modification of the ACEP cycle and the demonstration learning model. ACEP cycle modification has practical implications for writing skills. First, it can easily identify the initial condition of students' writing skills. Second, ACEP cycle modification allows teachers to better understand how students build an understanding of writing concepts. Third, students can actively participate in the learning process and fourth, teachers can observe the construction stage and measure student progress more accurately. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1457040 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1457040 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1457040 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Evaluation of the Application of the ACEP Cycle to Student Writing Learning Outcome – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ryan+Hidayat%22">Ryan Hidayat</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3590-8636">0000-0003-3590-8636</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Andayani%22">Andayani</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0923-2903">0000-0002-0923-2903</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Atikah+Anindyarini%22">Atikah Anindyarini</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4534-6836">0000-0002-4534-6836</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Education+and+e-Learning+Research%22"><i>Journal of Education and e-Learning Research</i></searchLink>. 2024 11(4):667-675. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Asian Online Journal Publishing Group. 244 Fifth Avenue Suite D42, New York, NY 10001. Fax: 212-591-6094; e-mail: info@asianonlinejournals.com; Web site: http://www.asianonlinejournals.com – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 9 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2024 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Junior+High+Schools%22">Junior High Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Middle+Schools%22">Middle Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Secondary+Education%22">Secondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Strategies%22">Educational Strategies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Skills%22">Writing Skills</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Improvement%22">Student Improvement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning+Processes%22">Learning Processes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Activities%22">Activities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Discussion+%28Teaching+Technique%29%22">Discussion (Teaching Technique)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Exercises%22">Writing Exercises</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Achievement%22">Achievement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Attitudes%22">Student Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Attitudes%22">Teacher Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Junior+High+Schools%22">Junior High Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Junior+High+School+Students%22">Junior High School Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Junior+High+School+Teachers%22">Junior High School Teachers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Independent+Study%22">Independent Study</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Curriculum%22">Curriculum</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Role%22">Teacher Role</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Language+Skills%22">Language Skills</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning+Theories%22">Learning Theories</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Indonesia%22">Indonesia</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2518-0169<br />2410-9991 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The modification of the ACEP cycle is a pedagogical strategy consisting of four components: (A) Activities. (C) Classroom discussion. (E) Exercises. (P) Performance. The application of ACEP cycle modifications is used as a strategy to improve writing skills. This is the primary focus to consider in improving writing skills. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how effective the process of learning writing skills was by applying ACEP cycle modifications. This study used a mixed-methods approach. At the qualitative stage, an explanatory description design strategy is applied to collect comprehensive and in-depth information about the learning model applied by the teacher in the classroom. A pre- and post-test control group design is used in the quantitative stage. The average score of students using the ACEP cycle modification was 82.64, higher than that of students who studied under the demonstration learning model which was 80.03. This finding is reinforced by the result of the significance coefficient = 0.006 < 0.05 so H0 is rejected. Thus, there is a difference in average student learning outcomes between the modification of the ACEP cycle and the demonstration learning model. ACEP cycle modification has practical implications for writing skills. First, it can easily identify the initial condition of students' writing skills. Second, ACEP cycle modification allows teachers to better understand how students build an understanding of writing concepts. Third, students can actively participate in the learning process and fourth, teachers can observe the construction stage and measure student progress more accurately. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1457040 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1457040 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 9 StartPage: 667 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Educational Strategies Type: general – SubjectFull: Writing Skills Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Improvement Type: general – SubjectFull: Learning Processes Type: general – SubjectFull: Activities Type: general – SubjectFull: Discussion (Teaching Technique) Type: general – SubjectFull: Writing Exercises Type: general – SubjectFull: Achievement Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Teacher Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Junior High Schools Type: general – SubjectFull: Junior High School Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Junior High School Teachers Type: general – SubjectFull: Independent Study Type: general – SubjectFull: Curriculum Type: general – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Teacher Role Type: general – SubjectFull: Language Skills Type: general – SubjectFull: Learning Theories Type: general – SubjectFull: Indonesia Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Evaluation of the Application of the ACEP Cycle to Student Writing Learning Outcome Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ryan Hidayat – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Andayani – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Atikah Anindyarini IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2024 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 2518-0169 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2410-9991 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 11 – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Education and e-Learning Research Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |