Are the Signs of Factor Loadings Arbitrary in Confirmatory Factor Analysis? Problems and Solutions

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Are the Signs of Factor Loadings Arbitrary in Confirmatory Factor Analysis? Problems and Solutions
Language: English
Authors: Dandan Tang (ORCID 0009-0007-3453-9660), Steven M. Boker, Xin Tong
Source: Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 2025 32(1):142-154.
Availability: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 13
Publication Date: 2025
Sponsoring Agency: National Institutes of Health (NIH) (DHHS)
Contract Number: 4R37HD05830527
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Test Validity, Factor Analysis, Replication (Evaluation), Social Science Research, Behavioral Science Research, Test Reliability, Error of Measurement, Statistical Significance, Robustness (Statistics), Structural Equation Models
DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2024.2351102
ISSN: 1070-5511
1532-8007
Abstract: The replication crisis in social and behavioral sciences has raised concerns about the reliability and validity of empirical studies. While research in the literature has explored contributing factors to this crisis, the issues related to analytical tools have received less attention. This study focuses on a widely used analytical tool - confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) - and investigates one issue that is typically overlooked in practice: accurately estimating factor-loading signs. Incorrect loading signs can distort the relationship between observed variables and latent factors, leading to unreliable or invalid results in subsequent analyses. Our study aims to investigate and address the estimation problem of factor-loading signs in CFA models. Based on an empirical demonstration and Monte Carlo simulation studies, we found current methods have drawbacks in estimating loading signs. To address this problem, three solutions are proposed and proven to work effectively. The applications of these solutions are discussed and elaborated.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2025
Accession Number: EJ1457215
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:The replication crisis in social and behavioral sciences has raised concerns about the reliability and validity of empirical studies. While research in the literature has explored contributing factors to this crisis, the issues related to analytical tools have received less attention. This study focuses on a widely used analytical tool - confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) - and investigates one issue that is typically overlooked in practice: accurately estimating factor-loading signs. Incorrect loading signs can distort the relationship between observed variables and latent factors, leading to unreliable or invalid results in subsequent analyses. Our study aims to investigate and address the estimation problem of factor-loading signs in CFA models. Based on an empirical demonstration and Monte Carlo simulation studies, we found current methods have drawbacks in estimating loading signs. To address this problem, three solutions are proposed and proven to work effectively. The applications of these solutions are discussed and elaborated.
ISSN:1070-5511
1532-8007
DOI:10.1080/10705511.2024.2351102