The Effectiveness of Between-Wave Mailings and Tailored Material Incentives on Response Rates: Results from a Young Adolescent Longitudinal Survey
Saved in:
| Title: | The Effectiveness of Between-Wave Mailings and Tailored Material Incentives on Response Rates: Results from a Young Adolescent Longitudinal Survey |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Roman Auriga, André Pirralha (ORCID |
| Source: | International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2025 28(1):119-131. |
| Availability: | Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 13 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Foreign Countries, Adolescents, Mail Surveys, Research Methodology, Response Rates (Questionnaires), Longitudinal Studies, Incentives, Participation, Attrition (Research Studies) |
| Geographic Terms: | Germany |
| DOI: | 10.1080/13645579.2024.2303031 |
| ISSN: | 1364-5579 1464-5300 |
| Abstract: | Mailing campaigns are a way to keep longitudinal survey respondents engaged. While mailings usually include a survey answer request, sometimes respondents are contacted between-waves to update contact information or simply to keep respondent contact. Research on the actual impact of these between-wave contacts on response rates is scarce. This paper addresses three research questions: (1) Do between-wave campaigns impact response rate? (2) Does the addition of non-monetary incentives to between-wave campaigns further impact response rates? (3) Do between-wave campaigns also affect other members of the household? Following a one-year break between survey waves, we design a randomized survey experiment assigning respondents to five treatment conditions. Results show that keeping-in-touch mailings did not significantly increase the likelihood of an interview in the National Educational Panel Study for either children or their parents in general. However, when we focus on specific characteristics of the targets, significant differences are found. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1458601 |
| Database: | ERIC |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Mailing campaigns are a way to keep longitudinal survey respondents engaged. While mailings usually include a survey answer request, sometimes respondents are contacted between-waves to update contact information or simply to keep respondent contact. Research on the actual impact of these between-wave contacts on response rates is scarce. This paper addresses three research questions: (1) Do between-wave campaigns impact response rate? (2) Does the addition of non-monetary incentives to between-wave campaigns further impact response rates? (3) Do between-wave campaigns also affect other members of the household? Following a one-year break between survey waves, we design a randomized survey experiment assigning respondents to five treatment conditions. Results show that keeping-in-touch mailings did not significantly increase the likelihood of an interview in the National Educational Panel Study for either children or their parents in general. However, when we focus on specific characteristics of the targets, significant differences are found. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1364-5579 1464-5300 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/13645579.2024.2303031 |
