Formation and Finitude: Jean-Luc Nancy on the Arts as Ontological Doorways

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Formation and Finitude: Jean-Luc Nancy on the Arts as Ontological Doorways
Language: English
Authors: Chris Higgins
Source: Educational Theory. 2024 74(6):873-887.
Availability: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 15
Publication Date: 2024
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Descriptive
Descriptors: Art Education, Aesthetic Education, Relationship, Individual Differences, Intermode Differences, Liberal Arts, Interdisciplinary Approach, Global Approach, Self Concept, Diversity, Discovery Processes, Creative Thinking
DOI: 10.1111/edth.12675
ISSN: 0013-2004
1741-5446
Abstract: In this article Chris Higgins considers two works by Jean-Luc Nancy -- "On Being Singular Plural" and "Why Are There Several Arts and Not Just One?" -- in light of the formative task to do justice to the diverse dimensions of oneself given the offerings and demands of the world, a task made difficult by our finitude and the existence of incommensurable goods. While Nancy helps us appreciate the value pluralism animating the (liberal) arts, Higgins argues, Nancy himself shies away from the full implications of his relational ontology. Rather than follow individual arts and artworks into the local habitations they open -- accepting the anguish of the arbitrary as the price of our finite but fulsome excursions into the reticulated real -- Nancy retreats to the level of a global account (if a lyrical one) of the local.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2025
Accession Number: EJ1459495
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:In this article Chris Higgins considers two works by Jean-Luc Nancy -- "On Being Singular Plural" and "Why Are There Several Arts and Not Just One?" -- in light of the formative task to do justice to the diverse dimensions of oneself given the offerings and demands of the world, a task made difficult by our finitude and the existence of incommensurable goods. While Nancy helps us appreciate the value pluralism animating the (liberal) arts, Higgins argues, Nancy himself shies away from the full implications of his relational ontology. Rather than follow individual arts and artworks into the local habitations they open -- accepting the anguish of the arbitrary as the price of our finite but fulsome excursions into the reticulated real -- Nancy retreats to the level of a global account (if a lyrical one) of the local.
ISSN:0013-2004
1741-5446
DOI:10.1111/edth.12675