Rhythm and Reading: Connecting the Training of Musical Rhythm to the Development of Literacy Skills

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Rhythm and Reading: Connecting the Training of Musical Rhythm to the Development of Literacy Skills
Language: English
Authors: J. Riikka Ahokas (ORCID 0000-0002-5118-0158), Suvi Saarikallio (ORCID 0000-0002-4647-8048), Graham Welch (ORCID 0000-0003-2258-8039), Tiina Parviainen (ORCID 0000-0001-6992-5157), Jukka Louhivuori
Source: Early Childhood Education Journal. 2025 53(4):999-1012.
Availability: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 14
Publication Date: 2025
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Elementary Education
Early Childhood Education
Grade 1
Primary Education
Grade 2
Descriptors: Elementary School Students, Elementary School Teachers, Music Education, Music, Language Rhythm, Grade 1, Grade 2, Literacy, Literacy Education, Reading Difficulties, Intervention, Correlation, Short Term Memory, Music Teachers, Teaching Methods
DOI: 10.1007/s10643-024-01654-4
ISSN: 1082-3301
1573-1707
Abstract: This study investigated whether enhanced rhythm training improves literacy development and working memory performance in pupils in the first and second year of school. According to recent literature, we hypothesized that rhythm-focused training could be effective for children with reading difficulties. Pupils aged 6 to 8 years participated in the study, implemented as part of regular school music lessons. Children were divided into an experimental group that received enhanced rhythm training and a control group that received an equivalent amount of music instruction but without enhanced rhythm training. The intervention was delivered once a week for three months (13 lessons in total). The test battery included pre- and post-measures (0 and 3 months, respectively) with literacy and working memory assessment, and follow-ups (8 and 20 months) with literacy assessment. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in literacy skills after training. However, there was a moderate improvement in working memory performance for the experimental, but not the comparison group. In a post hoc analysis, we found an effect in a subgroup of lower starting-level readers, as the increase in literacy development of these students was statistically significant in the experimental, but not in the comparison group.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2025
Accession Number: EJ1462369
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:This study investigated whether enhanced rhythm training improves literacy development and working memory performance in pupils in the first and second year of school. According to recent literature, we hypothesized that rhythm-focused training could be effective for children with reading difficulties. Pupils aged 6 to 8 years participated in the study, implemented as part of regular school music lessons. Children were divided into an experimental group that received enhanced rhythm training and a control group that received an equivalent amount of music instruction but without enhanced rhythm training. The intervention was delivered once a week for three months (13 lessons in total). The test battery included pre- and post-measures (0 and 3 months, respectively) with literacy and working memory assessment, and follow-ups (8 and 20 months) with literacy assessment. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in literacy skills after training. However, there was a moderate improvement in working memory performance for the experimental, but not the comparison group. In a post hoc analysis, we found an effect in a subgroup of lower starting-level readers, as the increase in literacy development of these students was statistically significant in the experimental, but not in the comparison group.
ISSN:1082-3301
1573-1707
DOI:10.1007/s10643-024-01654-4