How Similar Are Students' Aggregated State Emotions to Their Self-Reported Trait Emotions? Results from a Measurement Burst Design across Three School Years

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: How Similar Are Students' Aggregated State Emotions to Their Self-Reported Trait Emotions? Results from a Measurement Burst Design across Three School Years
Language: English
Authors: Melanie M. Keller (ORCID 0000-0003-0877-9779), Takuya Yanagida (ORCID 0000-0001-9052-4841), Oliver Lüdtke (ORCID 0000-0001-9744-3059), Thomas Goetz (ORCID 0000-0002-8908-2166)
Source: Educational Psychology Review. 2025 37(1).
Availability: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 38
Publication Date: 2025
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: High Schools
Secondary Education
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, High School Students, Affective Behavior, Emotional Response, Emotional Adjustment, Personality Traits, Anxiety, Psychological Patterns, Measurement Techniques, Affective Measures, Self Concept, Self Evaluation (Individuals), Comparative Testing, Longitudinal Studies, Data Interpretation, Data Collection, Student Behavior
Geographic Terms: Switzerland
DOI: 10.1007/s10648-025-09995-1
ISSN: 1040-726X
1573-336X
Abstract: Students' emotions in the classroom are highly dynamic and thus typically strongly vary from one moment to the next. Methodologies like experience sampling and daily diaries have been increasingly used to capture these momentary emotional states and its fluctuations. A recurring question is to what extent aggregated state ratings of emotions over a longer period of time are similar to self-reported traits of emotions. Thus, this study aims to investigate the extent of similarity between students' aggregated emotional states and self-reported traits over a two-week period in three consecutive school years (N[subscript T1] = 149, average age[subscript T1] = 15.64 years). Six discrete emotions (enjoyment, anger, pride, anxiety, shame, and boredom) were assessed in German, English, French, and mathematics classes. We investigated similarity in terms of convergence, mean-level differences, long-term stability, and incremental predictive validity of aggregated states and self-reported traits. Results indicated substantial convergence between aggregated states and self-reported traits, with both showing similar long-term stability. However, aggregated states did not demonstrate superior predictive validity compared to self-reported traits for academic outcomes, while momentary assessments offer insights into short-term emotional fluctuations, on a person-aggregated level aggregated states and self-reported traits behave rather similarly. This suggests that both can be used interchangeably to study students' trait-related research questions, like interindividual differences or long-term emotional processes in educational settings.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2025
Accession Number: EJ1462424
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Students' emotions in the classroom are highly dynamic and thus typically strongly vary from one moment to the next. Methodologies like experience sampling and daily diaries have been increasingly used to capture these momentary emotional states and its fluctuations. A recurring question is to what extent aggregated state ratings of emotions over a longer period of time are similar to self-reported traits of emotions. Thus, this study aims to investigate the extent of similarity between students' aggregated emotional states and self-reported traits over a two-week period in three consecutive school years (N[subscript T1] = 149, average age[subscript T1] = 15.64 years). Six discrete emotions (enjoyment, anger, pride, anxiety, shame, and boredom) were assessed in German, English, French, and mathematics classes. We investigated similarity in terms of convergence, mean-level differences, long-term stability, and incremental predictive validity of aggregated states and self-reported traits. Results indicated substantial convergence between aggregated states and self-reported traits, with both showing similar long-term stability. However, aggregated states did not demonstrate superior predictive validity compared to self-reported traits for academic outcomes, while momentary assessments offer insights into short-term emotional fluctuations, on a person-aggregated level aggregated states and self-reported traits behave rather similarly. This suggests that both can be used interchangeably to study students' trait-related research questions, like interindividual differences or long-term emotional processes in educational settings.
ISSN:1040-726X
1573-336X
DOI:10.1007/s10648-025-09995-1