The Middle School Blues: Temporal Directionality between Teaching Behavior and Students' Affect

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Middle School Blues: Temporal Directionality between Teaching Behavior and Students' Affect
Language: English
Authors: Patrick Pössel (ORCID 0000-0002-5851-4253), Shelby M. Burton
Source: Child & Youth Care Forum. 2025 54(3):571-588.
Availability: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 18
Publication Date: 2025
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Junior High Schools
Middle Schools
Secondary Education
Descriptors: Middle School Teachers, Middle School Students, Teacher Student Relationship, Teacher Behavior, Mental Health, Teacher Influence, Outcomes of Education
DOI: 10.1007/s10566-024-09829-1
ISSN: 1053-1890
1573-3319
Abstract: Background: Research clearly points toward a relationship between teaching behavior and students' affect. The relations between teaching behavior and middle school students' mental health, in the form of positive and negative affect, are particularly important to understanding how school-based clinicians can provide support for teachers and students alike. However, studies examining the relationship between teaching behavior and students' positive and negative affect are largely cross-sectional and focus on high school students. Objective: Our objective was to determine the temporal directionality between instructional, negative, organizational, and socio-emotional teaching behavior and affect in middle school students. Methods: At two time points, 335 students in grades 6 to 8 (mean age: 12.59; SD = 1.01; 47.4% female) filled out the Teaching Behavior Questionnaire and the Positive and Negative Affect Scale. Results: Our two-level hierarchical linear model analyses revealed no significant associations between teaching behavior and positive affect (ps > 0.05). However, socio-emotional teaching behavior and negative affect were positively and bidirectionally associated (ps < 0.01). Further, negative teaching behavior (p < 0.01) was positively associated with later negative affect and negative affect was negatively associated with later instructional teaching behavior (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Our findings highlight the differences in the existence and temporal directionality of associations between the different types of teaching behavior and students' positive and negative affect. In particular, different types of teaching behavior are only associated with students' negative but not positive affect. Experimental studies with students from more diverse ethnical and racial background are needed.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2025
Accession Number: EJ1471114
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Background: Research clearly points toward a relationship between teaching behavior and students' affect. The relations between teaching behavior and middle school students' mental health, in the form of positive and negative affect, are particularly important to understanding how school-based clinicians can provide support for teachers and students alike. However, studies examining the relationship between teaching behavior and students' positive and negative affect are largely cross-sectional and focus on high school students. Objective: Our objective was to determine the temporal directionality between instructional, negative, organizational, and socio-emotional teaching behavior and affect in middle school students. Methods: At two time points, 335 students in grades 6 to 8 (mean age: 12.59; SD = 1.01; 47.4% female) filled out the Teaching Behavior Questionnaire and the Positive and Negative Affect Scale. Results: Our two-level hierarchical linear model analyses revealed no significant associations between teaching behavior and positive affect (ps > 0.05). However, socio-emotional teaching behavior and negative affect were positively and bidirectionally associated (ps < 0.01). Further, negative teaching behavior (p < 0.01) was positively associated with later negative affect and negative affect was negatively associated with later instructional teaching behavior (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Our findings highlight the differences in the existence and temporal directionality of associations between the different types of teaching behavior and students' positive and negative affect. In particular, different types of teaching behavior are only associated with students' negative but not positive affect. Experimental studies with students from more diverse ethnical and racial background are needed.
ISSN:1053-1890
1573-3319
DOI:10.1007/s10566-024-09829-1