Research Integrity in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence
Saved in:
| Title: | Research Integrity in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Andrea Wilson (ORCID |
| Source: | Journal of Educational Research and Practice. 2025 15. |
| Availability: | Walden University, LLC. 100 Washington Avenue South Suite 900, Minneapolis, MN 55401. Tel: 800-925-3368; Fax: 612-338-5092; e-mail: JERAP@waldenu.edu; Web site: http://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/jerap |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 16 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Artificial Intelligence, Computer Software, Technology Integration, Accuracy, Likert Scales, Academic Standards, Difficulty Level, Faculty Publishing, Publish or Perish Issue, Integrity, Higher Education, Research, College Faculty, Questioning Techniques, Ethics, Scholarship |
| ISSN: | 2167-8693 |
| Abstract: | Protecting research integrity is crucial for maintaining trust in the scholarly record. Historically, threats to research integrity stemmed from deliberate human actions, such as data manipulation and misrepresentation. Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) is increasingly prevalent in higher education and is capable of generating research data and scholarly papers almost instantly. The immediate production of research data challenges traditional standards of academic rigor and integrity. The purpose of this study was to explore the role and impact of GAI on research integrity and the scholarly record, emphasizing the need for robust safeguards. For this study, we submitted Likert-type survey questions to GAI, specifically ChatGPT, and investigated how ChatGPT responded to the questions and generated quantitative and mixed-methods data that could be presented as human study participant responses. As GAI evolves, the academic community must address its potential misuse, particularly in research institutions where the pressure to "publish or perish" is pervasive. In the age of GAI, ensuring the accuracy and honesty of the scholarly record is imperative for the credibility of innovative and impactful research. Findings indicate that data integrity in higher education research may be at risk if institutions do not establish clear, enforceable guidelines and policies to mitigate the potential misuse of GAI. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1473719 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1473719 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1473719 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Research Integrity in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Andrea+Wilson%22">Andrea Wilson</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1471-654X">0000-0002-1471-654X</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cheryl+Burleigh%22">Cheryl Burleigh</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2393-5477">0000-0003-2393-5477</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Educational+Research+and+Practice%22"><i>Journal of Educational Research and Practice</i></searchLink>. 2025 15. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Walden University, LLC. 100 Washington Avenue South Suite 900, Minneapolis, MN 55401. Tel: 800-925-3368; Fax: 612-338-5092; e-mail: JERAP@waldenu.edu; Web site: http://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/jerap – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 16 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Artificial+Intelligence%22">Artificial Intelligence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Software%22">Computer Software</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Integration%22">Technology Integration</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Accuracy%22">Accuracy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Likert+Scales%22">Likert Scales</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+Standards%22">Academic Standards</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Difficulty+Level%22">Difficulty Level</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Faculty+Publishing%22">Faculty Publishing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Publish+or+Perish+Issue%22">Publish or Perish Issue</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Integrity%22">Integrity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research%22">Research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Faculty%22">College Faculty</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Questioning+Techniques%22">Questioning Techniques</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ethics%22">Ethics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scholarship%22">Scholarship</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2167-8693 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Protecting research integrity is crucial for maintaining trust in the scholarly record. Historically, threats to research integrity stemmed from deliberate human actions, such as data manipulation and misrepresentation. Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) is increasingly prevalent in higher education and is capable of generating research data and scholarly papers almost instantly. The immediate production of research data challenges traditional standards of academic rigor and integrity. The purpose of this study was to explore the role and impact of GAI on research integrity and the scholarly record, emphasizing the need for robust safeguards. For this study, we submitted Likert-type survey questions to GAI, specifically ChatGPT, and investigated how ChatGPT responded to the questions and generated quantitative and mixed-methods data that could be presented as human study participant responses. As GAI evolves, the academic community must address its potential misuse, particularly in research institutions where the pressure to "publish or perish" is pervasive. In the age of GAI, ensuring the accuracy and honesty of the scholarly record is imperative for the credibility of innovative and impactful research. Findings indicate that data integrity in higher education research may be at risk if institutions do not establish clear, enforceable guidelines and policies to mitigate the potential misuse of GAI. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1473719 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1473719 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 16 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Artificial Intelligence Type: general – SubjectFull: Computer Software Type: general – SubjectFull: Technology Integration Type: general – SubjectFull: Accuracy Type: general – SubjectFull: Likert Scales Type: general – SubjectFull: Academic Standards Type: general – SubjectFull: Difficulty Level Type: general – SubjectFull: Faculty Publishing Type: general – SubjectFull: Publish or Perish Issue Type: general – SubjectFull: Integrity Type: general – SubjectFull: Higher Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Research Type: general – SubjectFull: College Faculty Type: general – SubjectFull: Questioning Techniques Type: general – SubjectFull: Ethics Type: general – SubjectFull: Scholarship Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Research Integrity in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Andrea Wilson – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Cheryl Burleigh IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2167-8693 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 15 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Educational Research and Practice Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |