Smartphone GIS: Exploring Technological Competency in Active Learning across Geography
Saved in:
| Title: | Smartphone GIS: Exploring Technological Competency in Active Learning across Geography |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Paul Holloway, Sarah Thelen, Denise McCullagh, Peter Tangney, Koen R. Veenenbos, Sophie V. J. van der Horst, Agnes O'Leary, Suzanne Bermingham, Celena O'Brien, Niall O'Leary |
| Source: | Journal of Geography in Higher Education. 2025 49(3):376-397. |
| Availability: | Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 22 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Telecommunications, Handheld Devices, Geographic Information Systems, Geography Instruction, Active Learning, Educational Technology, Technology Uses in Education, Technological Literacy, Human Geography, Physical Geography, College Students, Student Attitudes, Program Effectiveness, Foreign Countries |
| Geographic Terms: | Ireland |
| DOI: | 10.1080/03098265.2024.2443908 |
| ISSN: | 0309-8265 1466-1845 |
| Abstract: | Smartphones are increasingly becoming embedded in geography curriculums, meaning research is needed to gather insights from the student perspective to guide best practice for optimised implementation across diverse cohorts. This is particularly important in the context of ensuring that UN Sustainable Development Goal 4 (Quality Education) is met. In this article, we report on the role that student competency in technology (i.e. everyday user versus occasional user) and sub-discipline (i.e. human geography versus physical geography) plays in student engagement with smartphone technology to support active learning. Exercises were developed in Survey123, Field Maps, and QField for QGIS across undergraduate and postgraduate geography programmes. Focus groups identified three common themes among students in response to the use of this mobile technology in geographic research. Firstly, our research highlights the need to consider technology learning as a dynamic entity, perhaps even a continuum, with students identifying negative opinions of their technology skillsets, even when their baseline was quite advanced. Secondly, such activities should not necessarily be uniform across cohorts of students, with our results identifying substantially different responses across undergraduate and postgraduate cohorts. Finally, we highlight the need to think critically about whether such smartphone applications are necessary for all data collection tasks across different application areas, with a preference for human geography exercises identified by students. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1473764 |
| Database: | ERIC |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | Smartphones are increasingly becoming embedded in geography curriculums, meaning research is needed to gather insights from the student perspective to guide best practice for optimised implementation across diverse cohorts. This is particularly important in the context of ensuring that UN Sustainable Development Goal 4 (Quality Education) is met. In this article, we report on the role that student competency in technology (i.e. everyday user versus occasional user) and sub-discipline (i.e. human geography versus physical geography) plays in student engagement with smartphone technology to support active learning. Exercises were developed in Survey123, Field Maps, and QField for QGIS across undergraduate and postgraduate geography programmes. Focus groups identified three common themes among students in response to the use of this mobile technology in geographic research. Firstly, our research highlights the need to consider technology learning as a dynamic entity, perhaps even a continuum, with students identifying negative opinions of their technology skillsets, even when their baseline was quite advanced. Secondly, such activities should not necessarily be uniform across cohorts of students, with our results identifying substantially different responses across undergraduate and postgraduate cohorts. Finally, we highlight the need to think critically about whether such smartphone applications are necessary for all data collection tasks across different application areas, with a preference for human geography exercises identified by students. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0309-8265 1466-1845 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/03098265.2024.2443908 |
