Described Neural Connections Enhance Classroom Learning of Neuroanatomy

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Described Neural Connections Enhance Classroom Learning of Neuroanatomy
Language: English
Authors: Nicholas C. Hindy (ORCID 0000-0003-1643-0251), Anthony J. Bishara (ORCID 0000-0002-7771-3565), John R. Pani
Source: Anatomical Sciences Education. 2025 18(7):642-656.
Availability: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 15
Publication Date: 2025
Sponsoring Agency: National Science Foundation (NSF)
Contract Number: 2315440
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Anatomy, Undergraduate Students, Neurosciences, Learning Processes, Feedback (Response), Memory, Diagnostic Tests, Brain Hemisphere Functions, Computer Assisted Instruction, Teaching Methods, Educational Benefits, Comparative Analysis, Textbooks, Retention (Psychology)
DOI: 10.1002/ase.70051
ISSN: 1935-9772
1935-9780
Abstract: Advances in brain imaging have led to a paradigm shift in neuroscience research, moving from focusing on individual brain structures to investigating neural networks and connections. However, neuroanatomy education still tends to concentrate on discrete brain regions. Two separate experiments in undergraduate neuroscience courses investigated whether incorporating neural connectivity into neuroanatomy education would enhance learning. Students in each experiment learned to identify brain structures through computer-based training sessions that provided text-based narrative feedback about neural connections, followed by final memory tests after a 1-month delay. The first experiment included 30 students and demonstrated a long-term memory benefit associated with described neural connections, showing a medium effect size (p = 0.01, d = 0.54) comparable to the established retrieval practice effect for enhancing long-term memory (p = 0.03, d = 0.47). The second experiment replicated the benefits of described neural connections with a small effect size (p = 0.005, d = 0.28) in a larger sample of 122 students across classrooms at two universities. Furthermore, students remembered the functional outcomes of neural connections from training (p < 0.001, d = 0.46), and this generalized to clinical applications (p = 0.009, d = 0.27). In contrast, categorizing brain areas without describing neural connections (as is commonly done in introductory neuroscience textbook chapters) did not benefit either memory or generalization. Findings demonstrate that leveraging the connectivity paradigm shift in neuroscience research can enhance neuroanatomy education. Emphasizing neural connections and their functional outcomes helps simplify neuroanatomy and improve understanding and retention.
Abstractor: As Provided
Notes: https://osf.io/dnu9x
Entry Date: 2025
Accession Number: EJ1475993
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:Advances in brain imaging have led to a paradigm shift in neuroscience research, moving from focusing on individual brain structures to investigating neural networks and connections. However, neuroanatomy education still tends to concentrate on discrete brain regions. Two separate experiments in undergraduate neuroscience courses investigated whether incorporating neural connectivity into neuroanatomy education would enhance learning. Students in each experiment learned to identify brain structures through computer-based training sessions that provided text-based narrative feedback about neural connections, followed by final memory tests after a 1-month delay. The first experiment included 30 students and demonstrated a long-term memory benefit associated with described neural connections, showing a medium effect size (p = 0.01, d = 0.54) comparable to the established retrieval practice effect for enhancing long-term memory (p = 0.03, d = 0.47). The second experiment replicated the benefits of described neural connections with a small effect size (p = 0.005, d = 0.28) in a larger sample of 122 students across classrooms at two universities. Furthermore, students remembered the functional outcomes of neural connections from training (p < 0.001, d = 0.46), and this generalized to clinical applications (p = 0.009, d = 0.27). In contrast, categorizing brain areas without describing neural connections (as is commonly done in introductory neuroscience textbook chapters) did not benefit either memory or generalization. Findings demonstrate that leveraging the connectivity paradigm shift in neuroscience research can enhance neuroanatomy education. Emphasizing neural connections and their functional outcomes helps simplify neuroanatomy and improve understanding and retention.
ISSN:1935-9772
1935-9780
DOI:10.1002/ase.70051