Gender Bias in Self-Perception of AI Knowledge, Impact, and Support among Higher Education Students: An Observational Study

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Gender Bias in Self-Perception of AI Knowledge, Impact, and Support among Higher Education Students: An Observational Study
Language: English
Authors: Cristina Cachero (ORCID 0000-0001-6281-8287), David Tomás (ORCID 0000-0003-3287-9366), Francisco A. Pujol (ORCID 0000-0002-6503-2076)
Source: ACM Transactions on Computing Education. 2025 25(2).
Availability: Association for Computing Machinery. 1601 Broadway 10th Floor, New York, NY 10119. Tel: 800-342-6626; Tel: 212-626-0500; Fax: 212-944-1318; e-mail: acmhelp@acm.org; Web site: http://toce.acm.org/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 26
Publication Date: 2025
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Gender Bias, Self Concept, Knowledge Level, Undergraduate Students, Student Attitudes, Gender Differences, Foreign Countries
Geographic Terms: Spain
DOI: 10.1145/3721295
ISSN: 1946-6226
Abstract: Objectives: This study investigates gender biases in AI perceptions among university students. It focuses on assessing self-perceptions regarding knowledge, impact, and support, with a specific emphasis on identifying any significant gender differences. The main hypotheses are focused on the existence of gender disparities in AI awareness, perceptions, and attitudes among higher education students. Participants: The study involves 380 participants, enrolled in undergraduate courses across various academic disciplines. Participants are university students with diverse backgrounds in terms of age, academic majors, and prior exposure to AI technologies. Study Methods: This research employs an observational study design. The sample size includes 380 participants. The study utilizes a structured questionnaire as the primary instrument for data collection. Outcome measures focus on variables such as perceived knowledge of AI, perceived impact of AI, and levels of support or apprehension towards AI technologies. Findings: The findings reveal significant gender differences, with females exhibiting lower levels than their male counterparts in the level of perceived knowledge about AI (p<0.005), exposure awareness (p = 0.001), perceived ability to apply AI (p = 0.004), sensitivity towards AI use of private data (p = 0.004), positive impact on society (p = 0.002), support for AI development (p<0.005), and positive expectations towards AI (p<0.005). Statistical analysis, including nonparametric tests, was used to validate these observations. Conclusions: There are notable gender biases in the knowledge and perception of AI among university students. These biases have implications for the future development and adoption of AI technologies, suggesting a need for more gender-inclusive educational strategies in AI. The findings underscore the importance of addressing gender disparities in AI education to ensure equitable access and understanding of these technologies. It is important to integrate gender perspectives in AI curriculum and policy-making to mitigate potential biases and enhance inclusivity in the field of AI.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2025
Accession Number: EJ1476238
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1476238
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Gender Bias in Self-Perception of AI Knowledge, Impact, and Support among Higher Education Students: An Observational Study
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Cristina+Cachero%22&quot;&gt;Cristina Cachero&lt;/searchLink&gt; (ORCID &lt;externalLink term=&quot;https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6281-8287&quot;&gt;0000-0001-6281-8287&lt;/externalLink&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22David+Tom&#225;s%22&quot;&gt;David Tom&#225;s&lt;/searchLink&gt; (ORCID &lt;externalLink term=&quot;https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3287-9366&quot;&gt;0000-0003-3287-9366&lt;/externalLink&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Francisco+A%2E+Pujol%22&quot;&gt;Francisco A. Pujol&lt;/searchLink&gt; (ORCID &lt;externalLink term=&quot;https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6503-2076&quot;&gt;0000-0002-6503-2076&lt;/externalLink&gt;)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;SO&quot; term=&quot;%22ACM+Transactions+on+Computing+Education%22&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;ACM Transactions on Computing Education&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/searchLink&gt;. 2025 25(2).
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Association for Computing Machinery. 1601 Broadway 10th Floor, New York, NY 10119. Tel: 800-342-6626; Tel: 212-626-0500; Fax: 212-944-1318; e-mail: acmhelp@acm.org; Web site: http://toce.acm.org/
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 26
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2025
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles&lt;br /&gt;Reports - Research
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;EL&quot; term=&quot;%22Higher+Education%22&quot;&gt;Higher Education&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;EL&quot; term=&quot;%22Postsecondary+Education%22&quot;&gt;Postsecondary Education&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Artificial+Intelligence%22&quot;&gt;Artificial Intelligence&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Gender+Bias%22&quot;&gt;Gender Bias&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Self+Concept%22&quot;&gt;Self Concept&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Knowledge+Level%22&quot;&gt;Knowledge Level&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Undergraduate+Students%22&quot;&gt;Undergraduate Students&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Student+Attitudes%22&quot;&gt;Student Attitudes&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Gender+Differences%22&quot;&gt;Gender Differences&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Foreign+Countries%22&quot;&gt;Foreign Countries&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Spain%22&quot;&gt;Spain&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1145/3721295
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 1946-6226
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Objectives: This study investigates gender biases in AI perceptions among university students. It focuses on assessing self-perceptions regarding knowledge, impact, and support, with a specific emphasis on identifying any significant gender differences. The main hypotheses are focused on the existence of gender disparities in AI awareness, perceptions, and attitudes among higher education students. Participants: The study involves 380 participants, enrolled in undergraduate courses across various academic disciplines. Participants are university students with diverse backgrounds in terms of age, academic majors, and prior exposure to AI technologies. Study Methods: This research employs an observational study design. The sample size includes 380 participants. The study utilizes a structured questionnaire as the primary instrument for data collection. Outcome measures focus on variables such as perceived knowledge of AI, perceived impact of AI, and levels of support or apprehension towards AI technologies. Findings: The findings reveal significant gender differences, with females exhibiting lower levels than their male counterparts in the level of perceived knowledge about AI (p&lt;0.005), exposure awareness (p = 0.001), perceived ability to apply AI (p = 0.004), sensitivity towards AI use of private data (p = 0.004), positive impact on society (p = 0.002), support for AI development (p&lt;0.005), and positive expectations towards AI (p&lt;0.005). Statistical analysis, including nonparametric tests, was used to validate these observations. Conclusions: There are notable gender biases in the knowledge and perception of AI among university students. These biases have implications for the future development and adoption of AI technologies, suggesting a need for more gender-inclusive educational strategies in AI. The findings underscore the importance of addressing gender disparities in AI education to ensure equitable access and understanding of these technologies. It is important to integrate gender perspectives in AI curriculum and policy-making to mitigate potential biases and enhance inclusivity in the field of AI.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2025
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1476238
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1476238
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1145/3721295
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 26
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Artificial Intelligence
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Gender Bias
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Self Concept
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Knowledge Level
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Undergraduate Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student Attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Gender Differences
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Spain
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Gender Bias in Self-Perception of AI Knowledge, Impact, and Support among Higher Education Students: An Observational Study
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Cristina Cachero
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: David Tomás
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Francisco A. Pujol
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 1946-6226
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 25
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: ACM Transactions on Computing Education
              Type: main
ResultId 1