Gender Bias in Self-Perception of AI Knowledge, Impact, and Support among Higher Education Students: An Observational Study
Saved in:
| Title: | Gender Bias in Self-Perception of AI Knowledge, Impact, and Support among Higher Education Students: An Observational Study |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Cristina Cachero (ORCID |
| Source: | ACM Transactions on Computing Education. 2025 25(2). |
| Availability: | Association for Computing Machinery. 1601 Broadway 10th Floor, New York, NY 10119. Tel: 800-342-6626; Tel: 212-626-0500; Fax: 212-944-1318; e-mail: acmhelp@acm.org; Web site: http://toce.acm.org/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 26 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Artificial Intelligence, Gender Bias, Self Concept, Knowledge Level, Undergraduate Students, Student Attitudes, Gender Differences, Foreign Countries |
| Geographic Terms: | Spain |
| DOI: | 10.1145/3721295 |
| ISSN: | 1946-6226 |
| Abstract: | Objectives: This study investigates gender biases in AI perceptions among university students. It focuses on assessing self-perceptions regarding knowledge, impact, and support, with a specific emphasis on identifying any significant gender differences. The main hypotheses are focused on the existence of gender disparities in AI awareness, perceptions, and attitudes among higher education students. Participants: The study involves 380 participants, enrolled in undergraduate courses across various academic disciplines. Participants are university students with diverse backgrounds in terms of age, academic majors, and prior exposure to AI technologies. Study Methods: This research employs an observational study design. The sample size includes 380 participants. The study utilizes a structured questionnaire as the primary instrument for data collection. Outcome measures focus on variables such as perceived knowledge of AI, perceived impact of AI, and levels of support or apprehension towards AI technologies. Findings: The findings reveal significant gender differences, with females exhibiting lower levels than their male counterparts in the level of perceived knowledge about AI (p<0.005), exposure awareness (p = 0.001), perceived ability to apply AI (p = 0.004), sensitivity towards AI use of private data (p = 0.004), positive impact on society (p = 0.002), support for AI development (p<0.005), and positive expectations towards AI (p<0.005). Statistical analysis, including nonparametric tests, was used to validate these observations. Conclusions: There are notable gender biases in the knowledge and perception of AI among university students. These biases have implications for the future development and adoption of AI technologies, suggesting a need for more gender-inclusive educational strategies in AI. The findings underscore the importance of addressing gender disparities in AI education to ensure equitable access and understanding of these technologies. It is important to integrate gender perspectives in AI curriculum and policy-making to mitigate potential biases and enhance inclusivity in the field of AI. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1476238 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1476238 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Gender Bias in Self-Perception of AI Knowledge, Impact, and Support among Higher Education Students: An Observational Study – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cristina+Cachero%22">Cristina Cachero</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6281-8287">0000-0001-6281-8287</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22David+Tomás%22">David Tomás</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3287-9366">0000-0003-3287-9366</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Francisco+A%2E+Pujol%22">Francisco A. Pujol</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6503-2076">0000-0002-6503-2076</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22ACM+Transactions+on+Computing+Education%22"><i>ACM Transactions on Computing Education</i></searchLink>. 2025 25(2). – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Association for Computing Machinery. 1601 Broadway 10th Floor, New York, NY 10119. Tel: 800-342-6626; Tel: 212-626-0500; Fax: 212-944-1318; e-mail: acmhelp@acm.org; Web site: http://toce.acm.org/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 26 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Artificial+Intelligence%22">Artificial Intelligence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Gender+Bias%22">Gender Bias</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self+Concept%22">Self Concept</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Knowledge+Level%22">Knowledge Level</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Undergraduate+Students%22">Undergraduate Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Attitudes%22">Student Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Gender+Differences%22">Gender Differences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Spain%22">Spain</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1145/3721295 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1946-6226 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Objectives: This study investigates gender biases in AI perceptions among university students. It focuses on assessing self-perceptions regarding knowledge, impact, and support, with a specific emphasis on identifying any significant gender differences. The main hypotheses are focused on the existence of gender disparities in AI awareness, perceptions, and attitudes among higher education students. Participants: The study involves 380 participants, enrolled in undergraduate courses across various academic disciplines. Participants are university students with diverse backgrounds in terms of age, academic majors, and prior exposure to AI technologies. Study Methods: This research employs an observational study design. The sample size includes 380 participants. The study utilizes a structured questionnaire as the primary instrument for data collection. Outcome measures focus on variables such as perceived knowledge of AI, perceived impact of AI, and levels of support or apprehension towards AI technologies. Findings: The findings reveal significant gender differences, with females exhibiting lower levels than their male counterparts in the level of perceived knowledge about AI (p<0.005), exposure awareness (p = 0.001), perceived ability to apply AI (p = 0.004), sensitivity towards AI use of private data (p = 0.004), positive impact on society (p = 0.002), support for AI development (p<0.005), and positive expectations towards AI (p<0.005). Statistical analysis, including nonparametric tests, was used to validate these observations. Conclusions: There are notable gender biases in the knowledge and perception of AI among university students. These biases have implications for the future development and adoption of AI technologies, suggesting a need for more gender-inclusive educational strategies in AI. The findings underscore the importance of addressing gender disparities in AI education to ensure equitable access and understanding of these technologies. It is important to integrate gender perspectives in AI curriculum and policy-making to mitigate potential biases and enhance inclusivity in the field of AI. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1476238 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1476238 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1145/3721295 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 26 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Artificial Intelligence Type: general – SubjectFull: Gender Bias Type: general – SubjectFull: Self Concept Type: general – SubjectFull: Knowledge Level Type: general – SubjectFull: Undergraduate Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Gender Differences Type: general – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Spain Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Gender Bias in Self-Perception of AI Knowledge, Impact, and Support among Higher Education Students: An Observational Study Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Cristina Cachero – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: David Tomás – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Francisco A. Pujol IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1946-6226 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 25 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: ACM Transactions on Computing Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |