Are My Learners Advanced?: Using Measures of Complexity and Accuracy to Analyze L2 Spanish Writing
Saved in:
| Title: | Are My Learners Advanced?: Using Measures of Complexity and Accuracy to Analyze L2 Spanish Writing |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Marie Mangold |
| Source: | Foreign Language Annals. 2025 58(2):326-345. |
| Availability: | Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 20 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Spanish, Second Language Instruction, Second Language Learning, Language Proficiency, Self Evaluation (Individuals), Accuracy, Teaching Methods, Writing Processes, Rating Scales, Guidelines, Correlation, Syntax, Criticism, Writing Skills, Phrase Structure, Error Patterns, Advanced Students |
| DOI: | 10.1111/flan.12788 |
| ISSN: | 0015-718X 1944-9720 |
| Abstract: | One of the critiques of proficiency as defined by scales, such as that of ACTFL, is its lack of grounding in linguistic realities. Measures of complexity, accuracy, and fluency provide a route in which proficiency can be quantitatively measured by identifying linguistic correlates (see Brown et al., 2017; Long et al., 2012). This project aimed to identify the linguistic correlates that distinguish L2 Spanish writing at intermediate-high and advanced-low proficiency levels as defined by the Language Ability Self-Evaluation Resource. Forty writing samples comprised the data. Measures of lexical complexity (density and diversity), syntactic complexity (mean length of T-unit, number of clauses per T-unit, average length of error-free T-unit), and accuracy (ratio of error-free T-unit, number of errors per 100 words) were used to analyze the samples. Findings suggest that accuracy is the linguistic feature that best distinguishes intermediate from advanced proficiency in L2 Spanish writing. The implications of these findings for research and pedagogy are examined. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1477333 |
| Database: | ERIC |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | One of the critiques of proficiency as defined by scales, such as that of ACTFL, is its lack of grounding in linguistic realities. Measures of complexity, accuracy, and fluency provide a route in which proficiency can be quantitatively measured by identifying linguistic correlates (see Brown et al., 2017; Long et al., 2012). This project aimed to identify the linguistic correlates that distinguish L2 Spanish writing at intermediate-high and advanced-low proficiency levels as defined by the Language Ability Self-Evaluation Resource. Forty writing samples comprised the data. Measures of lexical complexity (density and diversity), syntactic complexity (mean length of T-unit, number of clauses per T-unit, average length of error-free T-unit), and accuracy (ratio of error-free T-unit, number of errors per 100 words) were used to analyze the samples. Findings suggest that accuracy is the linguistic feature that best distinguishes intermediate from advanced proficiency in L2 Spanish writing. The implications of these findings for research and pedagogy are examined. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0015-718X 1944-9720 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/flan.12788 |
