A Case for Reimagining Universal Design of Assessment Systems
Saved in:
| Title: | A Case for Reimagining Universal Design of Assessment Systems |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Cara Cahalan Laitusis, Meagan Karvonen |
| Source: | Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. 2025 44(3):5-14. |
| Availability: | Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 10 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Descriptive |
| Descriptors: | Educational Assessment, Access to Education, Systems Approach, Psychological Needs, Inclusion, Test Use, Test Interpretation, Personal Autonomy, Test Validity, Assessment Literacy |
| DOI: | 10.1111/emip.12674 |
| ISSN: | 0731-1745 1745-3992 |
| Abstract: | The 2014 "Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing" describe universal design as an approach that offers promise for improving the fairness of educational assessments. As the field reconsiders questions of fairness in assessments, we propose a new framework that addresses the entire assessment lifecycle: universal design of assessment systems. This framework is rooted in the original Universal Design principles but extends beyond test design and administration to the entire assessment lifecycle, from construct definition to score interpretation and use. Another core tenet within this framework is the integration of psychological theory on universal human needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness with flexibility based on our contemporary understandings of neurodiversity, culture, and multilingualism. Finally, the framework integrates the original "Universal Design" principle of "tolerance for error," which promotes assessment designs that anticipate unintended actions and mitigate potential harms. After describing how the principles and guidelines might apply in contexts ranging from classroom assessments to statewide assessments and licensure exams, we conclude with practical implications and next steps. We hope future versions of the "Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing" incorporate this broader, systems-wide approach to universal design. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1482835 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1482835 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: A Case for Reimagining Universal Design of Assessment Systems – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cara+Cahalan+Laitusis%22">Cara Cahalan Laitusis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Meagan+Karvonen%22">Meagan Karvonen</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Educational+Measurement%3A+Issues+and+Practice%22"><i>Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice</i></searchLink>. 2025 44(3):5-14. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 10 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Descriptive – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Assessment%22">Educational Assessment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Access+to+Education%22">Access to Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Systems+Approach%22">Systems Approach</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychological+Needs%22">Psychological Needs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Inclusion%22">Inclusion</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Use%22">Test Use</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Interpretation%22">Test Interpretation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Personal+Autonomy%22">Personal Autonomy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Validity%22">Test Validity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Assessment+Literacy%22">Assessment Literacy</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1111/emip.12674 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0731-1745<br />1745-3992 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The 2014 "Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing" describe universal design as an approach that offers promise for improving the fairness of educational assessments. As the field reconsiders questions of fairness in assessments, we propose a new framework that addresses the entire assessment lifecycle: universal design of assessment systems. This framework is rooted in the original Universal Design principles but extends beyond test design and administration to the entire assessment lifecycle, from construct definition to score interpretation and use. Another core tenet within this framework is the integration of psychological theory on universal human needs for autonomy, competence, and relatedness with flexibility based on our contemporary understandings of neurodiversity, culture, and multilingualism. Finally, the framework integrates the original "Universal Design" principle of "tolerance for error," which promotes assessment designs that anticipate unintended actions and mitigate potential harms. After describing how the principles and guidelines might apply in contexts ranging from classroom assessments to statewide assessments and licensure exams, we conclude with practical implications and next steps. We hope future versions of the "Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing" incorporate this broader, systems-wide approach to universal design. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1482835 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1482835 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1111/emip.12674 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 10 StartPage: 5 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Educational Assessment Type: general – SubjectFull: Access to Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Systems Approach Type: general – SubjectFull: Psychological Needs Type: general – SubjectFull: Inclusion Type: general – SubjectFull: Test Use Type: general – SubjectFull: Test Interpretation Type: general – SubjectFull: Personal Autonomy Type: general – SubjectFull: Test Validity Type: general – SubjectFull: Assessment Literacy Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: A Case for Reimagining Universal Design of Assessment Systems Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Cara Cahalan Laitusis – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Meagan Karvonen IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 09 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0731-1745 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1745-3992 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 44 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |