Is the Use of Multiple-Choice Items and a Holistically-Scored Paragraph Translation Task Fair? Examining a Large-Scale Translation Subtest

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Is the Use of Multiple-Choice Items and a Holistically-Scored Paragraph Translation Task Fair? Examining a Large-Scale Translation Subtest
Language: English
Authors: Zhiqiang Yang, Chengyuan Yu (ORCID 0000-0001-8797-3902)
Source: Asia Pacific Education Review. 2025 26(2):493-502.
Availability: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 10
Publication Date: 2025
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Test Items, Scoring, Translation, Language Tests, Second Language Instruction, English (Second Language), Foreign Countries, Test Bias, Art Education, Humanities Instruction, Social Sciences, STEM Education, Majors (Students), Objective Tests, Sex Fairness
Geographic Terms: China
DOI: 10.1007/s12564-024-09993-y
ISSN: 1598-1037
1876-407X
Abstract: This study investigated the test fairness of the translation section of a large-scale English test in China by examining its Differential Test Functioning (DTF) and Differential Item Functioning (DIF) across gender and major. Regarding DTF, the entire translation section exhibits partial strong measurement invariance across female and male test takers, while exhibiting full measurement invariance across test takers in (1) arts & humanities and social sciences (A&HSS) and (2) science, technology, engineering or mathematics (STEM) majors. No major-based DIF was detected in this study. Objective test items tend to favor male test takers, while direct translation test task was more favorable to females. Combining the DIF and DTF results, there may be a cancelation effect in our case. However, the effect size of DIF is either negligible or slight to moderate, indicating minimal impact on the overall fairness of the translation test task. This study further discusses the necessity of exploring the source of DIF and the importance of combining DIF and DTF for test fairness research.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2025
Accession Number: EJ1487618
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:This study investigated the test fairness of the translation section of a large-scale English test in China by examining its Differential Test Functioning (DTF) and Differential Item Functioning (DIF) across gender and major. Regarding DTF, the entire translation section exhibits partial strong measurement invariance across female and male test takers, while exhibiting full measurement invariance across test takers in (1) arts & humanities and social sciences (A&HSS) and (2) science, technology, engineering or mathematics (STEM) majors. No major-based DIF was detected in this study. Objective test items tend to favor male test takers, while direct translation test task was more favorable to females. Combining the DIF and DTF results, there may be a cancelation effect in our case. However, the effect size of DIF is either negligible or slight to moderate, indicating minimal impact on the overall fairness of the translation test task. This study further discusses the necessity of exploring the source of DIF and the importance of combining DIF and DTF for test fairness research.
ISSN:1598-1037
1876-407X
DOI:10.1007/s12564-024-09993-y