Is Meeting Enough? Differences in Frequency and Consequences of Academic Advising Appointments between Marginalized and Mainstream College Students

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Is Meeting Enough? Differences in Frequency and Consequences of Academic Advising Appointments between Marginalized and Mainstream College Students
Language: English
Authors: Hua-Yu Sebastian Cherng (ORCID 0000-0003-2444-4354), Junhow Wei (ORCID 0009-0008-6751-9102), Martha Moreno (ORCID 0009-0009-0376-3656)
Source: Educational Researcher. 2025 54(9):516-527.
Availability: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 12
Publication Date: 2025
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Academic Advising, Higher Education, Minority Group Students, First Generation College Students, Race, Ethnicity, Student Characteristics, Proximity, Intervals, Outcomes of Education, White Students, Socioeconomic Status
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X251356501
ISSN: 0013-189X
1935-102X
Abstract: Scholars often suggest that marginalized students are less likely to connect with authority figures in college and thus do not reap the benefits those figures offer to mainstream students. To test this assumption, we draw on a data set containing records of every recorded advising appointment over 4 years for students at a large U.S. university system. We find that first-generation students are less likely to meet with academic advisers than continuing-generation students. However, other marginalized groups (racial/ethnicity minority, low-income, international students) are as or more likely to meet with advisers compared to mainstream students. Various groups experience GPA benefits from advising meetings; however, White students experience graduation benefits from advising meetings more than racial/ethnic minorities.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2025
Accession Number: EJ1490767
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:Scholars often suggest that marginalized students are less likely to connect with authority figures in college and thus do not reap the benefits those figures offer to mainstream students. To test this assumption, we draw on a data set containing records of every recorded advising appointment over 4 years for students at a large U.S. university system. We find that first-generation students are less likely to meet with academic advisers than continuing-generation students. However, other marginalized groups (racial/ethnicity minority, low-income, international students) are as or more likely to meet with advisers compared to mainstream students. Various groups experience GPA benefits from advising meetings; however, White students experience graduation benefits from advising meetings more than racial/ethnic minorities.
ISSN:0013-189X
1935-102X
DOI:10.3102/0013189X251356501